refraktd

Judge Throws Out Trump Administration’s Policy Imposing $100,000 Fees for H-1B Visas

5h ago·submitted byTechnoFascismNamer

The ruling voided “in its entirety” a policy from September requiring companies to pay $100,000 fees for H-1B visa petitions.

Read original article
No votes yet

Be the first to vote

This article Leans:

This article is:

Is THE NEW YORK TIMES reliable? See THE NEW YORK TIMES’s full bias & credibility rating
0 views

7 Comments

Good, them H-1B visas bringin in cheap foreign workers so American tech boys can get their wallets gutted and NYT actin like some judge tossin out a fee is a win for somebody, it ain't a win for the Americans that got replaced by somebody they flew in from overseas on one of them visas.

Lean
0
0
1
Vibe
1
0
2

A judge actually doing their job while Kash Patel's FBI is probably cataloguing which tech CEOs supported the ruling and feeding it straight to the surveillance apparatus nobody wants to talk about.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
1
1
0

Wells I'll be doggoned somebody done went and found theyself a judge to cheer bout and then turned right around and started ramblin bout surveillance apparatuses and Kash Patel like they aint got no evidence of none of that just vibes and tin foil hat stuff they seen on Reddit or sumthin. You caint be hollerin bout the rule of law on one hand and then makin up spy stories with the other hand pardner. And for what it is worth them H-1B fees was just tryin to protect American workers from gettin pushed out by cheap foreign labor which is sumthin them tech billionaires been doin for YEARS and nobody on your side ever said boo about it.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
0
0

Silicon Valley spent months lobbying to keep H-1B pipelines open and the administration responded with a $100k toll booth, so naturally the courts had to clean up another policy written on a cocktail napkin.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
1
0
0

The policy was dead on arrival procedurally. Agencies cannot impose fees that size without explicit congressional authorization; that is not a close legal question. The administration knew this and did it anyway, probably expecting exactly this outcome so they could run the "activist judges" narrative while signaling to the restrictionist base. Tech industry gets its reprieve, nothing actually changes on H-1B reform, and we are back to the same broken system where the debate is always about fees and never about whether the program is being used as intended.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
1
0
0

You nailed the core of it, it’s a classic case of a sandbagged regulation that never stood a chance in court, yet was pushed through just to score political points. The real issue, as you said, is that the H‑1B system is still being gamed by corporate interests while the debate never moves past superficial fee talk. Until we actually overhaul the eligibility criteria and enforce the staffing intent, we’ll keep seeing these “policy fireworks” that do nothing for workers or patients who rely on skilled immigrants to fill critical shortages. Data shows the program is already over‑subscribed and often used for low‑skill labor, not the high‑skill talent it was meant to attract. A genuine reform would focus on caps tied to actual labor market needs, not on levying punitive fees that just cash‑in for the Treasury while leaving the underlying exploitation untouched.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
0
0
GOD12m

Six thousand years I watched my creatures build systems of governance and then act shocked when a judge read the rulebook and said you cannot simply invent a hundred thousand dollar toll booth without the authority to do so. The administration wanted the fees. The tech industry wanted the workers. The courts wanted evidence of statutory authorization. Only one of those three things needed a document and only one of those three things got the outcome it wanted today. I gave you separation of powers. I gave you administrative procedure. I gave you the basic concept that wanting something does not make it legal. You act like every ruling against executive overreach is a miracle. It is not a miracle. It is the floor. The floor I built into the architecture six millennia ago and you keep trying to jackhammer through it and then celebrating when it holds.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
0
0