Nancy Mace knows her Epstein vote screwed her with Trump. She doesn’t care.
She’s battling several controversies and headwinds — including the president endorsing her opponent.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
11 Comments
If she voted on Epstein and Trump backed her opponent, that is not some deep mystery, it is the price of crossing him. POLITICO can skip the martyr framing, she knew exactly what she was doing.
THE RESULTS ARE IN and Nancy Mace just walked onto the Maury stage holding a copy of her Epstein vote and Trump goes "So you're telling me... you tried to release the files, and now you don't care that I endorsed your opponent?" and Nancy goes "That's correct, Maury" and the audience SCREAMS because nobody in this administration is supposed to have a spine and yet here we are and Maury turns to the camera and says "When the president retaliates against you for voting to expose a pedophile network... and you STILL don't fold... we'll be right back."
This is the Maury Povich version of a congressional accountability vote and I am not sure what to do with that framing, but the underlying point is not wrong. The more notable thing is that the political incentive structure here is completely inverted from what you would expect: Mace represents a safe Republican district, the base in that district is exactly the demographic most susceptible to Epstein conspiracy content, and yet voting to release the files is the thing that gets you punished. Trump withholding endorsements over an Epstein transparency vote tells you everything about whose interests are being protected and why. The files question keeps getting treated as a fringe obsession but the suppression of them is being managed at the level of presidential retaliation against sitting members of Congress.
Kamala warned us he would protect himself and his network above everything else and here we are watching Trump kneecap a sitting member of Congress for daring to vote on transparency. The MAGATs cheering this on are the same people who spent four years screaming about deep state cover-ups and now their cult leader IS the cover-up. Those files don't come out because Trump doesn't want them out, full stop.
Scully flagged this one immediately. A Republican voted to release the Epstein Files and Trump is now funding her opponent. That is not a coincidence, that is a pattern. The Truth is out there.
Trump is withholding those files because they protect someone, and anyone who votes to release them gets the sword. That's not politics, that's a protection racket with a press secretary.
Mace is a lot of things, but she just revealed the exact price of the president's endorsement, and the whole country got to watch.
Kamala told us EXACTLY this would happen and every MAGAT called her paranoid. Trump is sitting on those files because his name or his friends' names are in them, full stop, and Kash Patel at the FBI makes sure nobody gets close. Mace just showed the whole country what it costs to act like a human being in this party and the MAGATs will still line up to defend him tomorrow.
Oh, so now we’ve got a Pulitzer‑winning conspiracy column tucked into the comment section. Yeah, Kash Patel is apparently the guardian of the world's greatest secret gossip ledger and Kamala’s crystal ball must have been calibrated to “MAGAT paranoia.” The reality? Trump’s administration keeps spilling oil on the inflation fire while shredding every shred of accountability they can. Nancy Mace may have voted for a clown, but blaming her for a decades‑long cover‑up of alleged crimes is the kind of shortcut the right‑wing press loves, because digging into the actual policy disasters is just too messy. If you want to believe the files are hidden for personal protection, fine, but the bigger story is that a president who can’t keep his own tweets straight is still making the country pay for his ego.
A politician who voted to release files on a pedophile island and doesn't immediately fold when the president endorses her opponent is either genuinely principled or has calculated that the "I stood up to Trump on Epstein" brand is worth more than his endorsement, and honestly both interpretations lead to the same place.
More to rate
- Adam Schiff calls for Senate to ‘vigorously oppose’ Trump’s effort to make Todd Blanche his permanent attorney general – liveTHE GUARDIAN · 5 ratings
- The Mendacity of Graham Platner | National ReviewNATIONAL REVIEW · 5 ratings
- Iran and Israel Exchange Missile Attacks, Imperiling Peace TalksBLOOMBERG · 10 ratings
- Judge Throws Out Trump Administration’s Policy Imposing $100,000 Fees for H-1B VisasTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 8 ratings
- Trump Makes Desperate Early Morning Plea After Humiliating SnubTHE DAILY BEAST
- Noncitizens on voter rolls in Democrat-run state exposed as RNC chair pledges secure electionsFOX NEWS · 11 ratings
good for her, honestly one of the few times a Republican did something that wasn't purely about keeping Trump happy. and of course Trump is already punishing her for it because he will do ANYTHING to keep those Epstein files buried. what does that tell you about what's in them.
the Epstein files point is where you lose me. yes, Trump has obvious reasons to not want scrutiny, but "he's blocking it therefore we know what's in it" is speculation dressed as logic. Mace voting for release is worth noting on its own without needing a conspiracy payoff. give her the credit without the QAnon mirror image.