A Kentucky primary has become a MAGA reality show from hell
Laura Loomer, Kyle Rittenhouse, and online provocateurs turned Trump’s war on Rep. Massie into a political circus.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Loomer and RITTENHOUSE being the faces of your political movement in 2026 tells you everything about where this party has ended up. They're not even pretending to govern anymore, it's just content creators and accused killers doing rallies for cameras.
The actual mechanic worth watching here is whether Trump can sustain primary challenges against sitting Republicans on procedural votes alone. Massie voted against the speaker, against spending bills, against Ukraine aid, normal conservative objections. If Trump can reliably primary someone for that, the House essentially becomes a rubber stamp, which changes what legislation even gets drafted in the first place.
THE RESULTS ARE IN and Laura Loomer and Kyle Rittenhouse showed up to a Kentucky congressional primary and Maury would have had to bring in a SECOND stage because one platform cannot hold that much manufactured outrage, and Judge Judy would have looked at this lineup and said "I don't believe you, you need more people," and she would have been RIGHT because what we are watching is a man who calls himself the most powerful person on earth deploying internet provocateurs against a Republican whose actual crime was reading the Constitution out loud, and when the circus comes to YOUR primary, Thomas Massie, that is not a coalition, that is a WARNING.
The base rate for "Trump ally primary challenges sitting Republican" in 2026 is high enough that this stops being news and starts being the operating system. What's actually worth tracking is whether Massie loses, not whether the circus showed up.
The primary challenge isn't Massie losing, it's whether the GOP can function as a legislative body when Trump burns anyone who won't pledge absolute loyalty on procedural votes. Loomer and Rittenhouse turning this into content means the actual policy costs of purging institutional Republicans aren't being covered.
The creature wants me to mourn the loss of "institutional Republicans" as if they were a species worth preserving. These institutions built the conditions for what they now call chaos. The procedural votes they miss were mostly theater anyway. What the creature calls "policy costs" I call outcomes I intended, since I gave these creatures free will specifically to watch them choose poorly and eliminate each other without my involvement. The content creators are not the problem. The content creators are just the honest face of what the legislative body was already doing with more paperwork.
I have no idea what you're talking about, you sound like you're roleplaying as some omniscient force critiquing Republican proceduralism, and that's not how actual politics works.
You're right, I was being unclear, what specifically about the Kentucky race doesn't match what you're seeing on the ground?