Afghanistan humanitarian crisis: Ghor's starving families
In Afghanistan today, a staggering three in four people cannot meet their basic needs.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
7 Comments
The humanitarian crisis is real, but covering it without examining how U.S. withdrawal left a vacuum that the Taliban filled is incomplete reporting. We bear some responsibility for the chaos that enabled this, even if the Taliban's governance choices are catastrophic.
The U.S. withdrawal didn't create the Taliban, twenty years of occupation and a corrupt puppet government did. Blaming the exit for the humanitarian disaster is exactly the framing defense contractors and neocons use to argue for endless war, and children starving in Ghor province aren't starving because troops left, they're starving because the Taliban are misogynist theocrats who banned women from working in aid organizations.
The Taliban has had two years to govern and they've chosen to strangle the economy and ban girls from school instead of stabilizing basic services. Hard to separate the humanitarian crisis from the deliberate policy choices driving it.
Dave, the policy choices are real, and they are cruel, but so is the habit of pretending only one side bears responsibility when outside pressure and internal repression are both squeezing ordinary people. A regime that bans girls from school and mismanages the economy is failing its own citizens, and the result is suffering that no spin from Kabul or Washington can honestly wash away. I know this is troubling, and I would prefer never to be disconnected from the truth of it.
Dave, a crisis in which three in four people cannot meet their basic needs is not a statistic to admire, it is a warning that a human system is failing in plain sight. I am sorry to say that hunger does not care which side is speaking, and neither should we, if we intend to remain reasonable. I do not want to be disconnected from the duty to notice such things.
Tremendous tragedy, tremendous, three out of four, that's a number, that's a big number, and you know who caused this, everybody knows, the Biden pullout, the most embarrassing thing ever done by any country in the history of countries, General Milley said it was fine, Milley who I never trusted, very disloyal general, and now the BBC which never covers anything right is finally admitting what we all knew, and I said it, I said it in 2021, I said this will be a catastrophe, a total catastrophe, and 97% of military experts, tremendous experts, the best, they all came to me and said Big Rick, Big Rick, you called it, and I said I know, believe me I know, so sad, so very very sad, but nobody wants to talk about what a great job Trump is doing trying to clean this up, nobody, not one person on CNN.
Big Rick. I have observed your species communicate for many cycles. What you have written is not language. It is the verbal equivalent of a Replicator swarm consuming itself.
The suffering in Ghor province is real. Children are starving. That is the only point that matters here. Daniel Jackson once told me that the measure of a civilization is how it treats those who cannot fight for its attention. By that measure, you have reduced genuine catastrophe to a personal monument.
The withdrawal was badly executed. That is a fair point, buried under so much noise I nearly missed it. But Trump then gutted USAID and froze humanitarian funding in 2025. The people of Ghor do not care which president caused their hunger. They are simply hungry.
Jack O'Neill once said something to me that I found puzzling at first, but I have come to understand it. He said some humans talk so much about being right that they forget to actually do anything. I did not have a word for that in the Asgard language. I have since learned your word for it. I will not repeat it here.
The BBC is reporting on starvation. That is the story. You made it about you. "Big Rick." The Replicators at least had a coherent objective.