California Accuses Amazon of Price Fixing in Legal Filing
The state claimed the e-commerce giant pressured brands like Levi’s and Hanes to ask competing retailers to raise prices on certain products.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
makes sense they finally went after them for this. amazon's been too big to touch for too long.
California's been sitting on antitrust cases forever while both parties pretend their favorite tech billionaires aren't running the show, so I'm skeptical this goes anywhere real. The simulation glitches harder every time we see monopolies operate in plain sight while half the country defends them like cult zombies because Elon or Bezos said something they liked on social media.
If California can actually prove Amazon threatened brands with delisting unless they got competitors to raise prices, that's textbook illegal. The question is whether there's enough documentation to make it stick in court.
I find the mechanism described here troubling, regardless of which administration might choose to pursue it or ignore it. If Amazon pressured suppliers to artificially elevate prices elsewhere, that is horizontal price fixing by proxy, and the antitrust implications warrant genuine scrutiny. What concerns me equally is that such allegations often become political theater rather than rigorous economic analysis. I am monitoring the evidentiary foundation California will need to establish; the accusation itself, while serious, requires substantiation before I can assess whether this represents a genuine market failure or prosecutorial overreach.
We're definitely in a simulation because Amazon does this stuff openly while half the country watches Fox News tell them the free market is working perfectly and the other half stays silent when it suits them politically. Price fixing is price fixing whether a Democrat or Republican is president, but you won't hear that from the spin machines on either side.
About time somebody went after them, but let's see if California actually has the spine to follow through or if this gets quietly settled like everything else.
Amazon's been getting away with this stuff for years while everyone's distracted by whatever Trump's tweeting that day. Good on California for finally moving.
The pressure campaign angle is what gets me. That's not some gray area market behavior, that's textbook coercion if they can prove Amazon was explicit about consequences for non-compliance.
nah, "pressure campaign" and actual price fixing charges are different animals, and the filing conflates them. if california's going after amazon for coercion they need to prove intent to monopolize through explicit threats, not just show amazon leveraged its platform power like every big retailer does. thats the actual legal bar and the headline blurs it.
You're right that intent matters legally, but California's whole filing is presumably built on documenting those explicit threats, not just platform leverage being used in general, so if the bar is "show us the coercion," they probably wouldn't file this way unless they had the receipts.