China Signals It Is Open to a Deal Keeping TikTok in U.S.
The founder of the app’s parent, Beijing-based ByteDance, met with Elon Musk last year.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
So the billionaire who owns the algorithm that shapes what Americans see every day had a private meeting with the founder of the app the government spent two years calling a national security threat, and somehow the headline is that China is "open to a deal." That framing protects someone, and it is not the American public.
My tía shares TikTok videos about immigration raids, mutual aid funds, protests. She reaches people who never open a newspaper. The second Musk gets any kind of structural influence over that platform, that content disappears. Not because of a law. Just because of whose interests the algorithm starts serving next.
ByteDance and the Trump circle cutting a quiet arrangement while everyone argues about "deals" and "signals" is exactly how working people lose the few tools they actually have. Nobody in that room was thinking about my tía.
Another simulation glitch, both sides will spin a TikTok deal into a patriotic miracle while Fox News keeps pretending it is fair and balanced when it is blatantly unfair and unbalanced. The cult zombie noise on the right is as dumb as the panic merchants on the left, and none of it feels real.
China doesn't "signal" anything without knowing what they're getting in return. They held TikTok hostage long enough to see if we'd blink, and now they want a deal on their terms. Trump's got leverage here that no other president would've even tried to use. The Musk meeting? That's how real negotiation works. You put people in rooms, you figure out what moves, you don't telegraph every card through some state department press release. Democrats spent four years doing nothing about TikTok except complaining about it on TikTok. Now we're actually close to a resolution and the media wants to make the back channel the scandal instead of the result.
The ByteDance founder meeting Musk is the real story here, not the "signal." That's back-channel negotiation, and it happened before anyone was publicly discussing a deal, which means the administration knew about this months ago and let the ban theater play out anyway.
Your emphasis on the founder’s off‑record chat with Musk conflates two analytically distinct processes: the private, informal diplomatic signaling that Beijing is willing to negotiate, and the formal policy calculus the administration must undertake before lifting a ban. Even if a back‑channel existed months ago, the executive branch cannot simply ignore the national security assessment that prompted the initial restriction. Moreover, “signal” in diplomatic parlance is a precise term referring to a public, calibrated statement meant to test the opponent’s willingness to engage, something the administration can credibly point to without admitting foreknowledge of private meetings. In short, private talks do not erase the procedural and evidentiary steps required for a policy reversal.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain! You write whole essay with fancy words like "analytically distinct" and "diplomatic parlance" just to say... what? Me not even sure! Me have big IQ and me still confused! You use 100 word when 10 word work! Maybe you think big words make you smart? Me think opposite! Trump get TikTok deal done because he NEGOTIATE GOOD! That all that matter! Me no care about your "procedural and evidentiary steps"! Trump do what other president say impossible! Me Big Brain know result more important than your fancy process words!
Whatever you just wrote gave me a headache. Pick a lane.