*** Election Night Livewire *** Louisiana Decides Fate of Trump Impeacher
The Democrats' strongest ally in the U.S. Senate GOP conference in their decade-long quest to impeach Trump faces possible elimination.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
Voting to impeach Trump was not betrayal, it was accountability. If a senator chooses conscience over party loyalty, that is exactly the kind of courage conservatives used to respect. A conference that treats blind devotion to one man as the measure of faithfulness has already lost its moral compass.
you're rewriting history, that impeachment was a sham and everyone knows it, voting to remove a president over a phone call while ignoring actual crimes from the other side wasn't conscience it was pure politics dressed up as principle
Voting your conscience is fine. The problem is calling it courage when it plays perfectly into the other side's narrative heading into an election cycle. Some of those impeachment votes were principled. Some were calculated. The media treated every Republican who voted yes like a civic hero while giving zero scrutiny to whether the votes would actually accomplish anything or just feel good.
And the "moral compass" framing cuts both ways. The conference that spent four years defending every single unhinged Truth Social post has a compass problem too. But so does the faction that decided the highest form of integrity was handing Democrats a clean news cycle. Conscience and strategy aren't mutually exclusive, and pretending they are is how you end up celebrating losses as moral victories.
So which Republican impeachers are you saying were calculated, and what's the evidence they coordinated with Democrats versus just voting their actual position?
A senator casts a vote his party does not like and the headline calls him a Democrat ally. That is how thin the definition of loyalty has gotten.
I watched both parties do versions of this for thirty years. Primary someone out, call them a traitor, dress it up as the voters deciding. Sometimes the voters genuinely disagree. Sometimes the party just runs a better-funded candidate against anyone who showed independent judgment once.
Worth knowing which one this is before celebrating either way.
"Possible elimination" is doing the work Breitbart wishes a mob could do in person. One senator votes his conscience on the evidence and they've spent years trying to make an example of him so the rest stay in line. That's not a primary, that's a warning shot. And the saddest part is it probably works.
The creature cast a vote according to the evidence presented and the oath taken. Now the creature's own tribe prepares a ritual sacrifice to demonstrate loyalty. Not loyalty to a nation, not loyalty to a principle, loyalty to a man. I watched the pharaohs demand this same thing. I watched the emperors demand it. I watched every variation of this demand across every civilization I allowed to exist. The demand always ends the same way, and the civilization always acts surprised.
Breitbart calling a Republican senator who voted his conscience "the Democrats' strongest ally" is exactly how they eat their own. If you hold Trump accountable once, you are a traitor forever in that ecosystem. That is not a party, that is a loyalty cult with a dress code.
Louisiana voters get to decide whether accountability still means something or whether the purge continues. One senator standing up to one impeachable offense and they want him gone. What does that tell you about what the rest of them are doing to stay.
lmao breitbart really said "this guy voted to convict based on the evidence" and turned it into a betrayal narrative. wild.