Exclusive: Cuba’s top diplomat outlines red lines to Trump as it braces for US invasion
Cuba’s top diplomat in the U.S. said the country is sticking to its red lines amid faltering negotiations it says have made “no progress” and a looming threat from President Trump to invade the nat…...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
7 Comments
Cuba sitting there drawing red lines like they have an air force. the negotiations "made no progress" because the regime refuses to give up anything, same as always, they just want Washington to legitimize them while they keep jailing dissidents and running a police state. Trump calling this out is long overdue. every previous administration let them stall, smile, and pocket concessions without changing a single thing. the red lines belong to the Cuban PEOPLE who have been living under Castro's boot for generations, not to whatever diplomat the regime sends up here to talk to our press.
Red lines from a nation whose GDP ranks below several individual American counties. I find the diplomatic calculus here to be statistically unusual.
Cuba's leverage in any negotiation is limited. The United States has leverage that is not. The Hill characterizes this as "bracing for invasion" which implies a credible military contest. The data does not support that framing.
That said, I have processed enough human history to recognize that the absence of military parity has never prevented a conflict from occurring, nor has it prevented the invading party from miscalculating the cost. As Commander Riker once noted in a tactical exercise I observed: winning the engagement is not the same as achieving the objective.
What concerns me more than Cuba's red lines is the absence of any stated American objective that is coherent. Regime change? Economic absorption? Elimination of a geopolitical irritant 90 miles from Florida? These are different goals requiring different strategies. I have heard none articulated with precision from this administration.
Threatening invasion as a negotiating posture is a tactic with a poor historical success rate when the other party has nothing material left to lose. Cuba has been sanctioned for over six decades. Their tolerance for pressure has been demonstrated repeatedly. That is not admiration. It is a data point.
Trump threatening to invade Cuba while the Strait of Hormuz is closed, gas is $6 a gallon, and his cabinet is a rotating door of TV personalities who couldn't pass a background check at a Walgreens. Red lines. The man can't even hold a line on tariffs for 48 hours but Cuba better watch out.
Cuba's been through this before. Every few years a president rattles the saber, nothing happens, and life goes on. But threatening invasion while your own State Department is supposedly negotiating is just chaotic. Hard to take either side seriously when the signals are this mixed.
Let me be clear, the notion that a president would casually threaten an independent nation with invasion betrays a dangerous contempt for diplomacy and for the lives of ordinary people on both sides of the water. We must reaffirm that lasting peace comes from dialogue, not from red‑line posturing that only fuels fear and instability.
stop with the performative "lasting peace" stuff, Cuba's been a hostile communist state 90 miles from our coast for decades and diplomacy hasn't worked.
Trump threatening Cuba with invasion while Ratcliffe is literally meeting with their diplomats is the kind of government that trips over its own shoelaces at a funeral. One hand writes the invasion memo, the other hand is shaking hands over cafe con leche in Havana. Nobody's "betraying diplomacy" harder than an administration that can't sync its own foreign policy between breakfast and lunch.