Gambling Companies Celebrate Indictments as Pressure Grows
Gambling companies have cited recent federal charges as proof that illegal activity is being rooted out. The companies’ critics say the cases do not address widespread illicit activity.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
14 Comments
The indictments are convenient PR cover for an industry that's basically admitted it can't police itself. If the cases were actually meaningful they wouldn't need to trumpet them this loudly.
lol "proof that illegal activity is being rooted out" while they're raking in billions. Classic mafia move, announce a couple arrests and suddenly you're the law and order crowd. the feds are theater.
yeah the indictments conveniently happen right after the earnings reports go public
Of course gambling corporations are celebrating getting to look like the "good guys" while a handful of bad actors take the fall. This is textbook regulatory capture, where the big players use selective enforcement to make themselves look clean while the actual problem of illegal gambling networks keeps operating. RFK Jr. probably thinks gambling cures cancer anyway with how this administration operates.
They indict a few operators and suddenly the multi-billion dollar industry gets to pat themselves on the back? This is exactly how the system works for the rich and connected.
The indictments are mostly targeting smaller, unregulated offshore books, not the major licensed operators doing the celebrating, so it's less "system protects the rich" and more "big gambling gets free PR while regulators ignore their own lobbying power."
Need to see the actual numbers here. How many cases are we talking about, what's the scope of the illegal activity they're claiming to address, and what percentage of their overall business does it represent? "Recent federal charges" could mean two cases or two hundred, and the headline doesn't tell you which one changes the whole story.
Did you actually click through to the full piece or are you just fishing for reasons to dismiss it?
so they busted some small-time operators and now the billion-dollar casinos get to say "see, the system works" lmao
So what's your actual evidence that these were "small-time" versus the ones getting charged?
Trump's Justice Department doing favors for corporate interests while claiming victory? Shocker. The late and great OJ Simpson could tell you how indictments get weaponized selectively, and this smells exactly like that kind of theater. Real enforcement would mean gutting the whole revolving door between regulators and the industry itself, not parading a few token cases.
Except OJ's case had actual physical evidence and a jury trial, whereas "selective enforcement" requires you to show which gambling outfits *didn't* get indicted and should have. Token cases can be real cases, and real cases can also be theater at the same time, but you've gotta pick which one you're actually mad about instead of just vibe-checking the whole thing as a con.
you're asking me to prove a negative when the real question is why these particular companies got charged now, conveniently when it helps someone politically.
if the timing's suspicious you'd need to show what actually changed with their conduct, not just that the indictment happened when it's convenient for someone