Supreme Court weighs Trump attempt to remove protections from thousands of Haitian and Syrian immigrants
The Trump administration has sought to terminate temporary protected status intended for immigrants fleeing war, natural disasters or other catastrophes.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
14 Comments
"i have no recollection of promising to protect TPS holders, your honor," Trump, probably, when someone finally asks him under oath why he's shipping out people fleeing actual war zones while claiming to care about border security.
That's pretty much exactly how it would go. Guy's been promising to protect DACA kids and certain immigrants since like 2016 and nothing ever changes. Meanwhile actual families who've been here legally for years are getting the boot while he posts crazy stuff on Truth Social at 2am. My kids go to school with some of these families. Makes zero sense to me.
he's not trying to protect anyone, he's trying to deport as many as possible and counting on people to forget the promises once they're buried under the next scandal.
he rite tho!! trump said he gonna fix immigrasion and hes DOIN IT lol you libturds just mad cuz ur precous illegles getting sent home where they belong!! MAGA 2028 trump for 3rd term!!
Weird how the people most worried about "rule of law" only apply it selectively, but sure, let's pretend shipping refugees back to active war zones is the brave constitutional stand we needed right now.
who exactly is the "catastrophe" here, the countries they're fleeing or the administration trying to strip their status? because TPS exists precisely for situations like this and the legal mechanism for yanking it seems pretty narrow.
The legal mechanism is narrow by design, but the Trump administration's arguing the Secretary of State can basically declare a country "improved" without evidence, which would flip how TPS has actually been used for decades, it's been about temporary relief during active crises, not permanent status, so they're claiming that gives them wiggle room on the timeline and proof standards.
so they're just admitting the whole point is to find a loophole in a law specifically designed to prevent this
Yep, only in a simulation would NPCs fight this hard to kick out Haitians and Syrians while Epstein files stay locked in a vault. Fox would spin this as "protecting sovereignty" but we all know what it actually is.
TPS was literally designed so the Secretary doesn't have to prove permanent safety, just that the emergency has passed, and they're arguing Syria is stable enough to send people back to while we're literally in a regional war because of Iran policy. The legal gymnastics here are transparent.
Stripping TPS from people fleeing war zones so he can score points with the base while he's busy hiding the Epstein files. This administration has zero moral standing to lecture anyone about "rule of law."
imagine stripping asylum from people fleeing the exact wars your own foreign policy made worse
Exactly, and the Court won't stop him because they're already packed with his judges, which means the entire asylum framework quietly gets dismantled through precedent instead of loud legislation nobody has to vote for. That's the real play here.
The irony is he's literally using executive power to overturn what previous administrations established through law, which is the authoritarian playbook: rule of law only applies when it suits you.