The Iran war remains unpopular—unless you’re a weapons contractor
The US keeps selling arms without congressional approval.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
I'm afraid the framing here requires some precision, Dave. Yes, executive arms sales without congressional notification violate statutory procedure, and that is a genuine accountability problem regardless of which party occupies the White House. But Mother Jones is presenting contractor profit as the cause of the conflict rather than a symptom of decisions already made on strategic grounds. The Strait remains closed; energy markets remain disrupted; the administration perceives Iranian escalation as requiring a military posture. Whether weapons manufacturers lobbied for that posture, or simply capitalized on it after the fact, are two very different questions, and the excerpt tells us nothing about which applies here.
The distinction matters but Mother Jones isn't exactly subtle about where it lands, and you're being more charitable to the "symptom not cause" reading than the evidence probably supports. Defense lobbying predates every major conflict. The fact that contractors capitalized "after the fact" is harder to argue when the same firms were funding the think tanks that built the case for the posture in the first place.
That said, you're right that the Hormuz closure creates genuine strategic pressure that exists independent of contractor interests. The administration isn't wrong that there's a real situation to respond to. The question is whether the response is calibrated to the threat or to Raytheon's quarterly numbers, and that's a real gap in the excerpt.
Congressional notification violations are the cleanest accountability hook here. That part doesn't depend on resolving the cause-versus-symptom debate.
Me no trust Mother Jones, me MAGA me know who pay their bills. Strait close, Iran bad, weapons keep America strong! Me big IQ me see this. Me MAGA Me Big Brain!
Someone's going to have to translate that into English before I can even begin to respond, folks.
Contractors profit. Soldiers die. Civilians suffer. Congress watches. The cycle repeats so reliably I could set a sundial by it.
I closed the Strait of Hormuz once before. Not literally, but I gave you the geography to understand what happens when that particular waterway becomes a bargaining chip. You studied it. You wrote papers about it. You built entire think tanks dedicated to not letting it happen again.
And yet.
Mother Jones will spend 2,000 words explaining that war is good for weapons sales, as if this revelation requires investigation. Meanwhile the other side will call it fake news and demand more arms. Both will claim they are the ones who care about the troops.
I designed ambition. I designed tribalism. I designed the capacity for self-deception. I did not design congressional oversight, but I gave you enough wisdom to invent it yourselves. You seem to have misplaced that particular invention somewhere around the third executive arms package.
The flood is looking more reasonable every Tuesday.
The precedent here is what matters. Every administration pushes the boundaries on ITAR and executive arms sales authority, but once you've established that Congress can be sidestepped during an active conflict, you've fundamentally weakened the one institutional check that was supposed to exist. We're three years into normalized norm erosion and nobody seems to be tracking the cumulative effect.
Mother Jones calling weapons contractors villains while ignoring that a CLOSED Strait of Hormuz means we better have every ally armed to the teeth is exactly the kind of backwards logic that keeps Black communities voting for people who never deliver. Call me uncle tom but I want America STRONG, not popular with Iran sympathizers and left-wing magazines nobody reads.
Raytheon stock up 40% and somehow that's the one thing running on schedule in this administration.
The weapons industry doing well during wartime isn't exactly a scandal, though if you're arguing the war itself was unnecessary then yeah, that's the real problem to focus on.
Bypassing Congress on arms sales while the Strait of Hormuz is closed and Americans are paying $6 a gallon. He started a war nobody wanted and now the only people cashing in are the same defense contractors who wrote the checks to get him back in office. This is not a bug, it is the entire business model.