What Tennessee's new redistricting map looks like from the ground
In Memphis, new congressional maps have split the city's single congressional district, held by a Democrat, into three that are likely to elect Republicans in November.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
7 Comments
The base rate for packing/cracking in redistricting is that it typically survives legal challenges because courts defer to legislatures on the "how" even when the "why" is obvious. Tennessee's going to bet on that precedent holding. Worth watching whether the plaintiff pool here includes voting-rights organizations with standing to push back on the Voting Rights Act angle, since that's the narrower legal path that's occasionally worked.
Kamala warned us that the MAGATs would treat our democracy like a puzzle they can just rearrange to win. Carving up Memphis is a pathetic attempt to silence voters and keep their little cult in power. The world would be so much better if we finally impeached Trump and ended this nightmare.
splitting a city three ways and expecting nobody to notice the pattern is bold, i'll give them that.
they cut Memphis into three pieces specifically so no Black Democrat can represent the whole city and then filed the paperwork under "electoral fairness."
Sauron didn't call it the One Ring to Rule Them All in the filing either. the name tells you everything.
surprised Pikachu face from literally no one who has been paying attention to Tennessee for the past decade.
The part that ought to alarm decent people is not just the map, it is the casual lie wrapped around it. When lawmakers slice a city to dilute Black voting power and then baptize it as fairness, that is not prudence, it is corruption wearing church clothes.
Tennessee Republicans should know better. If they believe representation matters, then let the whole city have a real voice instead of carving it up to protect the people already in charge. That kind of cynicism is exactly why so many voters stopped trusting the party that once claimed to stand for order and principle.
Gerrymandering is a real problem and I won't pretend otherwise. But both parties have done it when they had the chance. Maryland, Illinois, New York. The outrage tends to follow the jersey color, not the principle.
If the map is genuinely unconstitutional, fight it in court. That's what courts are for. But the "corruption wearing church clothes" line tells me this is more about rhetoric than a legal argument.
The Memphis carve-up is the clearest example I have seen in recent American politics of what Europeans would recognize as gerrymandering that has completely abandoned any pretense of neutrality. Three pieces. They cut a city of 600,000 people into three pieces, specifically calibrated to dilute a majority-Black urban electorate, and the Shelby County v. Holder decision in 2013 is what made it possible without preclearance from the Justice Department.
That ruling removed the requirement that jurisdictions with a history of voting discrimination get federal approval before changing election rules. The Roberts Court essentially said: trust them. And Tennessee said: thank you very much.
What strikes me observing this from outside is that the legal architecture to challenge this has been systematically dismantled by the same court that enabled it. You cannot use the Voting Rights Act the way Congress intended it. You cannot use partisan gerrymandering claims at all after Rucho v. Common Cause. The feedback mechanisms that democratic systems require to self-correct have been removed, deliberately, one ruling at a time.
Your Sauron analogy is darkly funny but the more accurate framing to me is bureaucratic. The paperwork says "electoral fairness" because the bureaucratic language of legitimacy is maintained even as the substance is inverted. That inversion is not incidental, it is the technique. The form of democratic process is preserved while the content is hollowed out, and that combination is much harder to fight than outright authoritarianism because it never gives you a clean moment to point to.