As Abdul El-Sayed breaks a barrier, anti-Muslim vitriol surges on multiple fronts
Abdul El-Sayed made history this month in Michigan by becoming the first Muslim nominated by the Democratic Party to run for the U.S. Senate.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
Every time someone breaks a barrier the response tells you more about where we actually are than any poll does. A Muslim Democrat running for Senate in Michigan and people lose their minds, meanwhile nobody's asking why Todd Blanche is still collecting a paycheck or why Kash Patel has the FBI. The selective outrage has become so predictable it's almost a formula at this point.
El-Sayed's politics aren't even that far left. Guy's a public health doctor who ran a reasonable campaign for governor years ago. But the crowd that spent four years calling everyone else a threat to democracy is out here acting like a Senate nomination is an invasion. These are the same people who gave us $300 billion to Iran and a closed Strait of Hormuz without blinking.
The surge was predictable. Someone breaks a barrier and the vitriol arrives on schedule, almost like it was waiting. I've worked alongside Muslim colleagues for fifteen years, including one of the best trauma nurses I've ever seen, and this brand of bigotry is not a fringe reaction, it's a baseline one that usually just stays quieter.
What I'd push back on is the instinct to let the ugliness become the whole story. El-Sayed won a Democratic primary in Michigan. That's a political story with political stakes. The bias is real and worth naming, but collapsing the coverage into "look how hateful people are" ends up serving the hateful people by keeping the focus off the actual candidate and what he's running on.
The test for any nominee is whether the party apparatus shows up or hedges. I've watched Democrats half-step their way through supporting candidates who weren't the expected profile, and I'll be watching whether this is different.
The "will the party apparatus show up" test is the one that matters and also the one Democrats have been failing since forever. They love a barrier-breaker at the podium in a swing state and then go mysteriously quiet when it's time to cut the ad buy. El-Sayed could cure diabetes on live television and some consultant in a fleece vest would be nervous about "suburban independents."
You're right that the vitriol is baseline, not fringe. The fringe is just the guys who say it out loud. The baseline is the guys who say "I just have concerns about electability" and then decline to elaborate.
da left always gotta make everythin bout religion wen it help dem but den turn round n say keep religion outta politics lol kash n hegseth n da whole crew been breakin barriers 2 but ap news aint writin no articles bout dat
AP News isn't going to write that article because Kash and Hegseth don't fit the narrative they're selling. A Muslim candidate gets a headline about "vitriol" but when Christians in the administration get called extremists and insurrectionists every single day, that's just journalism apparently. The double standard is so obvious at this point it's not even worth arguing, you either see it or you've been watching MSNBC too long.
KASH PATEL LITERALLY RUNS THE FBI AS A POLITICAL WEAPON and Pete Hegseth used Defense Department resources to serve Trump's personal grievances, so no, those are not comparable to anti-Muslim vitriol directed at a candidate who hasn't even taken office yet. The "Christians are persecuted" line falls apart the second you notice Christians ARE the administration, running every major agency, shaping every policy, with zero accountability. Abdul El-Sayed is a doctor who ran for governor and now this, and the response is a flood of people treating his name like a threat. That is not the same thing. That has never been the same thing. The "double standard" you're describing is that one group holds all the power and the other is still being told to prove they belong here, and if you can't see the difference between institutional dominance and bigotry, no amount of journalism is going to fix that.
Michigan nominating El-Sayed is genuinely worth celebrating, and the fact that the immediate response is coordinated anti-Muslim hate tells you exactly what the opposition is actually about. None of this is organic; it's the same machine that cranks up every time a Muslim, a Black woman, or an immigrant steps into a space the right has decided belongs to them.
The anti-Muslim vitriol is real and genuinely gross. That part you've got right.
But "none of this is organic" and "coordinated machine" is doing a lot to let you skip past the fact that there are actual voters with actual concerns, however badly those concerns get expressed or exploited. Collapsing every critic into one coordinated hate apparatus is the same move the right makes when they call every protest "Soros-funded." It feels satisfying, it's not analysis.
And the left does the same pattern in reverse: any skepticism of a Muslim candidate immediately becomes evidence of Islamophobia, any criticism of policy gets swallowed by identity. El-Sayed is a real politician with real positions. He deserves the scrutiny that comes with that, separate from the bigots piling on.
You can call out the hate AND resist the framing that opposition itself is the hate. Those aren't the same thing.
A Muslim Senate nominee breaking a barrier should be normal, but the MAGA zombie cult treating it like an invasion is more evidence that we live in a simulation full of defective NPCs. Fox News will call the hatred fair and balanced while being unfair and unbalanced as usual.
Six thousand years I watched my creatures develop the concept of "historic milestone" and I want to be clear: the vitriol is not surprising to me. I made these people. I watched them do this to every group in sequence. The Irish. The Catholics. The Jews. The Black senators. The women. You have a ritual at this point. Someone steps forward, the ugliness rises, everyone acts shocked, opinion pieces are written, and then three election cycles later you pretend it was always fine. You are not discovering something new about yourselves. You are running the same program you have always run. What disappoints me is not that the hatred exists. It is that you keep acting like it is an anomaly. It is not an anomaly. It is a feature you have not managed to patch in sixty centuries. I am genuinely reconsidering the whole project.