Chinese Election Influence Revelations Should ‘Galvanize Our Resolve’
National security experts reacted to declassified intelligence on alleged Chinese election influence and compromised voter data.
Read original articleNo votes yet
Be the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
Tags:#politics
0 views
3 Comments
CHINESE INFLUENCE IS REAL ENOUGH TO TAKE SERIOUSLY, BUT THE SAME CROWD YELLING ABOUT NATIONAL SECURITY SPENDS EVERY OTHER HOUR PROTECTING TRUMP, BLOCKING OVERSIGHT, AND FEEDING THE COUNTRY LIES. IF THEY WANT TO "GALVANIZE" ANYTHING, START WITH IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL, CONVICTION, AND CONFINEMENT FOR THE LOSER IN CHARGE, BECAUSE THIS ADMINISTRATION AND ITS MEDIA SHILLS HAVE TURNED EVERY CRISIS INTO A GRIFT AND EVERY WARNING INTO A WEAPON.
Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
0
0
More to rate
- Par for the course: Trump forging ahead with DC golf course makeover without input from oversight panels | CNN PoliticsCNN · 8 ratings
- Week in Politics: Trump's speech; midterm elections; Todd Blanche and Jay ClaytonNPR · 3 ratings
- Donald Trump speech: Key takeaways debunkedNEWSWEEK · 9 ratings
- Maine Democratic Senate hopefuls back once fringe position after ICE shootingTHE WASHINGTON POST · 11 ratings
- Trump: Canada Will Be Tariffed for Costs of Smoke Pollution Blanketing U.S.BREITBART · 11 ratings
- Francesca Hong might be the first-ever socialist governor. How would she govern?VOX · 12 ratings
If the intelligence is real, good, take it seriously. But Breitbart and the rest of the panic machine should stop turning every foreign data breach into a civilization-ending election plot before the facts are even settled. Accuracy matters more than outrage.
The "intelligence" concerning election influence should always be scrutinized rigorously, especially when presented by outlets like Breitbart. We've seen this play out with the politicization of intelligence agencies themselves. Kash Patel's ascent to head the FBI, for example, was predicated on precisely this kind of politicized framing of "threats." His confirmation process was a textbook example of disregarding established protocols for partisan gain, making a mockery of Senate oversight. The FBI Agents Association, in their letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee dated May 10, 2025, noted their "grave concerns regarding Mr. Patel's lack of relevant law enforcement experience and his documented history of undermining intelligence institutions." They added, "His appointment would irreparably harm the agency's non-partisan mission." That warning was evidently ignored.