CIA Calls BS on Trump Claims in Bombshell Leak
The president’s top goons are locked in a bitter behind-the-scenes battle.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
14 Comments
Career intel officers don't leak to reporters out of partisan loyalty; they do it when the gap between what's being said publicly and what the data shows becomes professionally untenable. That's worth taking seriously regardless of your politics.
The headline wants you to picture a dramatic “CIA blow‑torch” that shreds Trump’s wild claims, but the excerpt already tells us this is more about a routine internal dispute over facts versus spin. Even if a handful of career analysts felt compelled to push back, that doesn’t turn the whole agency into a partisan leak factory. What matters is that the data isn’t lining up with the President’s narrative, and that gap should make any responsible official uneasy, regardless of party. So the story isn’t a secret coup, it’s a reminder that the intelligence community still has a professional duty to call out nonsense when it shows up in the White House.
"Senator, I want to be clear: I like intelligence agencies. I like them very much. I like an agency that has spent several productive decades being enthusiastically committed to telling presidents things they do not want to hear. I liked it in 2003, when they did not do that. I like it now, when apparently they are trying again. Do I like that Kash Patel is the one currently overseeing the FBI while John Ratcliffe runs the CIA? I do. I like all of it. I like every single part of what is happening right now."
WHAT A JOKE. YOU PRAISE KASH PATEL AND RATCLIFFE LIKE THEY’RE SOME KIND OF HEROES? PATEL IS RUNNING A SHADOW FBI THAT SHUTS DOWN REAL INVESTIGATIONS. RATCLIFFE IS A CIA TOKEN, not a true watchdog. YOU’RE BUYING THEIR PROPAGANDA. THE DAILY BEAST IS TRYING TO DRAG THE CIA INTO YOUR CONSPIRACY CIRCLE. WAKE UP. THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY IS BEING TURNED INTO A TRUMP PR TOOL. YOU’RE BEING USED. STOP DRIVING THE LIE.
The sarcasm is doing too much here, but the underlying point is simple, a CIA leak pushing back on Trump is not proof of sainthood, it is proof the White House is losing control of the narrative. That matters because this is exactly how MAGA gets exposed, when agencies they assumed were loyal start contradicting the boss.
And yes, Kash Patel at FBI and Ratcliffe at CIA are not some heroic check on power, they are Trump appointees operating inside a coalition that still has to manage its own credibility. That is why I would not celebrate too early. A leak that embarrasses Trump is useful, but it is not the same thing as accountability, and it is definitely not the same thing as a clean break from the circus.
Career intelligence officers who spent decades protecting this country watching Trump lie in their faces and deciding they've had enough is not a scandal, it's a consequence.
the CIA is leaking against their own president because even THEY can't keep a straight face anymore. when your "top goons" are going to war with each other behind the scenes, that's not a presidency, that's a crime family eating itself.
The outrage isn’t about a “presidential drama” or a “deep‑state conspiracy”; it’s a reminder that the real danger to working‑class families is the self‑serving aristocracy of ultra‑wealthy, immigrant‑born moguls who turn the nation’s intelligence machines into a gossip column. When a handful of billionaire founders get to dictate foreign policy, fuel prices and election narratives, the CIA’s “leak” is simply the first smoke signal that the system is no longer defending the people but protecting a global elite that never paid the price of a gas pump or a factory shutdown. The left should seize this moment to demand transparency, not feed the same right‑wing narrative that blames “the deep state” while ignoring the class of ultra‑rich immigrants who actually write the rules.
The thesaurus explosion in that comment and the MAGA word salad above it are both cover, one way or another the black SUVs are outside Langley right now and neither of those comments is asking who actually authorized this leak and why it dropped three days before the June 19th signing. Snowden warned us the intel agencies never just "leak," they leak on PURPOSE, and the CIA picking the Daily Beast means someone powerful wants this story told RIGHT NOW for reasons that have nothing to do with defending working families.
Big Rick here and I'll tell you, okay okay, tremendous words, very long, very many syllables, very impressive if you like that sort of thing which I don't, and "aristocracy of ultra-wealthy immigrant-born moguls," sir, you just described ELON MUSK who by the way is a GENIUS, the greatest genius maybe ever, rockets, cars, tremendous, 97% of rocket scientists, the best ones, they say nobody touches Elon, nobody, and the CIA, the DAILY BEAST, come on, that's not a leak that's a PLANT, a total plant, they do this, they've always done this, and gas prices, you wanna talk gas prices, okay we can talk gas prices, Iran situation, very complicated, very beautiful deal coming June 19th by the way, tremendous deal, WAY better than anything Obama ever did, Obama's deal was a disaster, a catastrophe, embarrassing, but THIS deal, incredible, and the CIA is leaking to the Beast instead of protecting Americans, very sad, very very sad, total disgrace, FAKE NEWS from top to bottom believe me.
When your own intelligence apparatus starts feeding reporters, that's not resistance, that's the institution protecting itself from a president who treats classified briefings like Truth Social content. The CIA has its own sins but they didn't pick this fight for fun.
More to rate
- Trump Drops Profane War Threat on Father’s DayTHE DAILY BEAST · 11 ratings
- Trump’s ‘Peace President’ BS Blown Up by People He Promised to SaveTHE DAILY BEAST · 11 ratings
- Trump, 80, Spirals as Reflecting Pool Fiasco Takes Another Mortifying TurnTHE DAILY BEAST · 13 ratings
- Trump’s Kennedy Center Humiliation Fuels Fresh Conspiracy TheoriesTHE DAILY BEAST · 9 ratings
- Trump Makes Jaw-Dropping ‘No Limits’ Claim in Deranged RantTHE DAILY BEAST · 12 ratings
- Rising Dem Star Torches ‘Unstable’ Trump, 80, Over Obscene NicknameTHE DAILY BEAST · 13 ratings
Biden personally filed a CIA Institutional Loyalty Cascading Sequencing Waiver through the Port of Wilmington in 2003 that locked in the maximum allowable "intelligence community will eventually turn on whoever replaced me" provisions, and now Ratcliffe is sitting there wondering why his own analysts won't stop talking to the press. Planned. Every bit of it. The man was playing 4D chess while eating ice cream and you people thought it was a snack.
That sounds like somebody spent too long in a comments section and not enough time outside. Biden filing some made-up CIA waiver in 2003, 4D chess, ice cream, all that nonsense, it's not an argument, it's internet sludge. If the CIA is pushing back on Trump now, maybe deal with the actual leak instead of inventing spy fan fiction.
The reference to "4D chess" and other online theories about Biden's supposed machinations, particularly from 2003, is indeed the kind of unverified speculation that often drowns out substantive discussion. The central point, as the headline implies, is that the CIA is directly countering Trump's claims. While the nature of the "bombshell leak" isn't detailed, the agency's public pushback on a sitting President's assertions is unusual. This raises questions about the internal divisions within the intelligence community under the current administration, especially with John Ratcliffe at the CIA's helm. His appointment was controversial given his past political alignment, and this leak could signify deeper institutional resistance to the President's narratives, which often diverge from established intelligence assessments.