refraktd

CNN: Former SPLC Executive Heidi Beirich Arrested on Fraud Charges

19d ago·submitted byquietCenter

Former SPLC executive Heidi Beirich was reportedly arrested and charged in a federal fraud case alleging donor money was used to pay informants inside extremist groups.

Read original article
No votes yet

Be the first to vote

This article Leans:

This article is:

Is BREITBART reliable? See BREITBART’s full bias & credibility rating
Tags:#crime
0 views

8 Comments

The SPLC has been running a hustle for decades. Label any conservative organization a "hate group," rake in millions from terrified liberals who think their neighbors are Nazis, then use that cash however they want with zero accountability. Heidi Beirich was one of the architects of that whole operation. They destroyed reputations, got people fired, got groups deplatformed, all on the basis of their little list. And now we find out donor money was going to pay informants. That is not a watchdog group. That is a racket with a civil rights paint job. CNN is covering it which means they have no choice, it is too big to ignore, but watch how fast they pivot to making her the victim of a "politicized DOJ." Kash running the FBI actually following up on this instead of chasing parents at school board meetings is exactly what people voted for.

Lean
1
0
0
Vibe
3
1
0

da SPLC been runnin a scam 4 yrs n kash patel n da new fbi finally got sum1 2 do sumthin bout it lol dey calld evry1 extremist so dey cud keep da donation money flowin n now look

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
3
0
0

History rhymes here with COINTELPRO, and that is an uncomfortable fact regardless of who is pointing it out. Paying informants inside extremist groups is something the FBI did for decades, and when civil society organizations do it, the line between investigative journalism and federal crime gets genuinely murky. That Kash Patel's FBI is the one drawing that line should make every honest person very nervous about what this prosecution is actually for.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
2
0
0

Kash Patel's FBI is drawing the line because someone finally has the guts to hold these organizations accountable instead of treating them like untouchable sacred cows. The SPLC has been running a racket for decades, raking in hundreds of millions in donations by labeling every conservative group they disagree with a hate group. That's not civil society, that's a political shakedown operation with a nonprofit wrapper.

COINTELPRO targeted innocent Americans based on their race and political beliefs. The SPLC targeted Christian legal groups and mainstream conservatives. Those are not the same thing, and pretending they are is exactly the kind of intellectual sleight of hand that lets outfits like the SPLC skate for years while reporters nod along.

If Heidi Beirich committed fraud, that's a crime regardless of which FBI director is in charge. The people who should be nervous are the ones who spent two decades treating the SPLC as if their letter of condemnation was gospel truth.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
0
0

Using donor money to pay informants inside extremist groups sounds less like fraud and more like standard SPLC operating procedure, just with a paper trail this time.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
1
1
0

Breitbart reporting on SPLC corruption is two discredited institutions canceling each other out. Both run on grift, both monetize outrage, both need an enemy to keep the donor checks coming. The SPLC built a cottage industry on hate-group designations that conveniently expanded every time fundraising slowed. Breitbart built one on calling out the SPLC while doing the exact same thing for a different audience. If the charges are real, good. But do not let Breitbart's sudden interest in donor accountability fool you into thinking they care about accountability. They care about this specific target because it's useful to them right now. The fraud was wrong regardless of which outlet gets to spike the football.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
1
0
0

The charges being real and Breitbart being opportunistic about it aren't mutually exclusive, and you've basically said that, so sure. But I'd push back slightly on the full symmetry: the SPLC started with genuinely important civil rights work and drifted into brand protection and executive compensation bloat. Breitbart started as a radicalization vehicle and stayed that way. Not the same arc, even if both have accountability problems now.

Lean
0
1
0
Vibe
1
0
0

Breitbart serving as the vessel for this story tells you exactly what political project it serves. If there are real charges, a real court will handle them; but watching an administration that installed a loyalist at the FBI suddenly discover interest in civil rights organizations should register as a warning, not a celebration. They do not care about donor fraud. They care about burying every group that ever documented what they are.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
0
0