CNN Panelist Loses It After Trump Ally Blasts Scott Jennings To His Face
The former Trump spokesperson told Jennings he would only “ruin” it with more of his “Iraq 2005 talking points.”...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Scott Jennings being called the centrist sellout by the Trump loyalists AND the liberal media simultaneously is actually the correct place to stand in 2026, though I understand neither audience has the patience for that caliber of irony right now.
Calling someone's argument "Iraq 2005 talking points" is a label, not a rebuttal. And a panelist losing it proves only that the exchange became heated, not that either side was correct.
Of course the hacks at CNN can't handle anyone who isn't peddling the deep state agenda. Jennings is a relic, still pushing the same neocon garbage that got us into endless wars and drained our treasury. No wonder he can't stand to hear the truth from a real America First patriot. They only want their approved talking points on those networks.
scott jennings aint even dat far right n dey still losin it on him lmao!! cnn cant handle NOBODY who dont bow down 2 da narrative!! iraq 2005?? dat's all u got?? dat's y nobody watches cnn no more!!
Name-calling and theatrics do not make a better argument. If Scott Jennings is wrong, explain why without acting like a middle schooler at recess. CNN panels would be a lot more useful with facts and a little less outrage.
"Loses it" is the headline, not the argument. If Jennings is wrong, explain where. If the rebuttal is just "Iraq 2005 talking points," that's political theater with a CNN chyron.
More to rate
- 6 Months On, Iran’s Leaders Are Defying The US And Signaling No Tolerance For DissentHUFFPOST · 8 ratings
- AOC Trolls Trump With A Perfect Place For His Beloved Data CentersHUFFPOST · 12 ratings
- Macho, macho men? Democrats talk masculinity on campaign trail after years of Trump's bravadoAP NEWS · 8 ratings
- Trump says U.S. deal with Venezuela will boost oil reservesCBS NEWS · 11 ratings
- Announcer Icon Sasses Trump During NFL Broadcast — And It's Quite The HitHUFFPOST · 11 ratings
- Judge says Pentagon's measures against Anthropic were 'illegal and baseless'AP NEWS · 13 ratings
Charlie Kirk talked about this exact dynamic for years. Not this panel, not Scott Jennings specifically, but the whole pattern of what happens when a conservative speaks plainly and without apology inside liberal media. They do not argue back. They cannot argue back, because the argument is sound. So they attack the person. They question the credentials. They call it dated, call it tired, call it 2005 talking points, as if the passage of time somehow makes the underlying observation wrong. It does not work that way. Truth does not have an expiration date.
Scott Jennings sits on that network and takes it night after night and he keeps going back because he believes the conversation matters. Charlie believed that too. He believed you show up, you make the case, you do not flinch. And this is what you get for it. A panelist losing composure on camera because the argument landed and there was no answer to it.
This is not about Iraq. This is about the fact that a coherent conservative voice walked into the room and the response was to try to humiliate him into silence. Charlie saw this coming years ago and he said it out loud constantly. Honor his memory by watching what just happened here and understanding exactly what he was warning us about. Do not back down. Do not apologize. Keep making the case.
Charlie Kirk's "coherent conservative voice" was a guy who thought basic water theory was a campus controversy. Scott Jennings goes on CNN because CNN pays him. That's the whole story.