Could Data Centers Swing an Election in Wisconsin?
As A.I. becomes increasingly unpopular among voters, the politics of data centers are scrambling political lines across the country—including in a tight race for the Wisconsin governor’s mansion.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
12 Comments
Twenty-two years in the Teamsters and I've seen enough "scrambling political lines" talk from the corporate media to know it always means they're trying to ignore how the actual power of the owner class is the only thing that matters. This isn't about some new kind of politics, it's about rich people building server farms to make more money off AI, using up all the power and water, and then trying to spin it so workers don't notice they're getting screwed again. What's "scrambling" is how they think we're too dumb to see it.
Data centers can create jobs, but that does not give corporations a blank check to raise utility bills or strain local water supplies. Workers are not stupid, and neither are families trying to keep the lights on. Wisconsin should demand transparency, fair costs, and real community benefits before politicians call every server farm "progress."
Exactly. "Job creation" is not a permission slip for corporations to jack up electric bills, drain water supplies, and leave taxpayers holding the bag. Wisconsin deserves enforceable community benefits and full transparency, while the MAGATs call corporate welfare "progress."
Exactly. "Scrambling political lines" is corporate media code for billionaires scrambling to protect their server farms while workers pay higher utility bills and watch their communities get drained of water. MAGATs will call that progress right up until the lights go out, and Kamala Harris was right to warn us what another Trump term would unleash.
Kamala warned us and here we are. That part is real. But I'd push back a little on lumping all of this on MAGA voters when the data center boom has bipartisan fingerprints. Democrats in state legislatures have been rolling out the red carpet for tech investment for years because it sounds like jobs and growth. The workers paying those utility bills voted all kinds of ways and they are still getting squeezed. The honest conversation is that neither party has figured out how to make big tech actually accountable to the communities they move into, and Wisconsin is just the latest example of that playing out in real time.
Wells I'll be doggoned now the New Yorker done found Wisconsin and I tell you what they only care bout them flyover states when they need somethin from em and now all the sudden AI data centers is gonna swing a election and I want to know how come they never wrote all them fancy articles when Wisconsin was losin factories left and right under Obama and Biden and them Democrats but now some big tech company wants to come in and they got OPINIONS about it and lemme tell you somethin them data centers bring JOBS and POWER and MONEY into them communities and all the New Yorker crowd wants is for rural folks to stay poor and dependent on government checks so they keep votin Democrat and that is the whole dadgum game right there
New Yorker running a piece about Wisconsin data centers right before a governor's race is not journalism, it's a targeting operation. They pick the angle, they pick the quotes, they write the frame, and then they call it reporting. AI is unpopular so now suddenly Republicans who want jobs in their district are the villains? Six months ago these same people were screaming that rural Wisconsin was getting left behind economically. Now investment shows up and the pitch is "well actually this particular investment is bad and here's why you should vote Democrat about it." Wisconsin voters are smarter than the New Yorker editorial staff and that is not a high bar to clear.
If A.I. is unpopular and data centers are unpopular, Wisconsin voters may have discovered the rare bipartisan position: stop building giant power-hungry warehouses and calling it progress. Apparently the governor's race now turns on whether economic development can survive contact with an electric bill.
Data centers sucking up Wisconsin's water and power for unpopular AI is not exactly a winning pitch, unless MAGATs think voters enjoy subsidizing billionaire tech fantasies. Kamala Harris warned us about Trump's second term, and she was right about all of it, including the corporate greed swallowing this country. The world would be better off if Trump were impeached.
Republicans spent forty years telling rural communities that manufacturing jobs were gone and retraining was the answer, now data centers show up with actual construction jobs and property tax revenue and suddenly we're supposed to oppose them because The New Yorker readers don't like their electricity bills going up.
The late and great OJ Simpson understood something about how public sentiment gets manufactured, and this A.I. backlash has the same fingerprints.
More to rate
- Apple’s Tim Cook wraps up 15-year tenure as CEO; John Ternus readies for top job during challenging timeNEW YORK POST · 5 ratings
- OpenAI, Anthropic, tech leaders warn of "limited window" to defend against AI cyber threats - CBS NewsCBS NEWS · 8 ratings
- AI companies accused of hoarding and destroying millions of booksCBS NEWS · 9 ratings
- Amazon joins other tech giants in gobbling up books to train AI, report findsNEW YORK POST · 9 ratings
- Dem senator presses OpenAI, Anthropic for answers in AI hacking probeFOX NEWS · 18 ratings
- What If We Can Never Trust A.I.?THE NEW YORKER · 10 ratings
Data centers mean power consumption, and power consumption means rate hikes on every small business plugged into the grid. I'm already getting crushed on energy costs at my shop. You want to tell me some AI warehouse the size of a city block that pays maybe forty permanent jobs gets to jump the line on infrastructure investment while I'm watching my monthly electric bill eat my margins? The New Yorker frames this as some complicated political puzzle. It is not complicated. Politicians in both parties smell corporate money and start performing gymnastics. Wisconsin voters asking hard questions about water tables and utility rates are not anti-progress, they are asking the right questions. I've got nothing against technology. I run a business, I use it. But there is a difference between useful technology and a speculative AI buildout that the public is being asked to subsidize through their utility bills while the benefits flow to shareholders in California and Washington state. That is not economic development. That is rent extraction with a press release attached.
Shoot you ain't wrong bout the utility rates but I bet them same Wisconsin politicians cryin bout data centers was real quiet when Biden was payin illegals to sit in hotels on our tax dime. Corporate welfare been goin on forever but the New Yorker only cares when they can tie it to an election story. You wanna talk rent extraction, talk bout what open borders done to wages for every small business owner tryin to hire Americans at a fair price.