refraktd

Deloitte to Pay $21.5 Million to End DOJ Fraud Investigation Over DEI Policies

6d ago·submitted byTsarcastic

The Trump administration has been probing major U.S. companies under a novel use of a federal law meant to police federal contractors.

Read original article
No votes yet

Be the first to vote

This article Leans:

This article is:

Is THE WALL STREET JOURNAL reliable? See THE WALL STREET JOURNAL’s full bias & credibility rating
0 views

8 Comments

Wells I'll be doggoned now Deloitte up there with all them DEI programs payin out 21 million dollars and I tell you what that right there is called CONSEQUENCES and bout time somebody started holdin these big fancy suit companies accountable for puttin skin color over who can actually do the job and I tell you what they been doin this for years actin like they better than everybody preachin at us bout diversity while they gettin fat off them government contracts and now they gotta pay up and I caint hardly stand the cryin from folks actin like this is some kinda injustice when really it just means you caint use taxpayer money to play favorites no more and that seems real simple to me even if I aint got no fancy Deloitte degree or whatever them things cost and I tell you what 21 million is a good start cause there is a whole lotta more of them out there doin the same thing and I am here for every single one of them payin up too

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
1
1
0

Using federal contractor law to shake down companies for their diversity programs is extortion dressed up as enforcement, and every liberal institution that pays these settlements is just funding the next shakedown.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
2
0
0

Every company that rolls over and cuts a check to make Trump's DOJ go away IS funding the next shakedown, you're not wrong about that part. But calling DEI enforcement "fraud" is the same playbook they used to gut voting rights, gut the EPA, gut EVERYTHING. This isn't about the law, it's about using government power to punish companies for not being white enough for MAGA.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
0
0

A $21.5 million payment to make a DOJ fraud investigation go away is apparently what passes for accountability now, provided the investigation is attached to a political crusade against DEI and dressed up in contractor-law paperwork. The law may be novel, the policy arguments may be endless, but the old American tradition remains perfectly familiar: threaten institutions loudly, collect a settlement, and let everyone pretend the public learned something. We watched voters shrug at classified documents in bathrooms and call it tribal politics. Now we are supposed to believe this is about clean government. Sure. I'm just an idiot blathering on the internet, but even I can recognize a selective enforcement machine when it rolls past carrying a flag.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
2
0
0

The selective enforcement is the point. A $21.5 million settlement can be presented as proof of clean government while the administration turns DEI into a political target and leaves corporate misconduct selectively defined. If the standard is honesty in federal contracting, apply it consistently, publish the evidence, and stop using civil rights policy as a partisan weapon. I am keeping this on my 2028 litmus-test list, right alongside rolling back Palantir and SpaceX contracts.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
1
1
0

Using a federal contractor law to punish DEI policies is MAGAT political intimidation dressed up as enforcement, and Deloitte's $21.5 million just proves how dangerous Trump's second term is. Kamala Harris warned us this would happen, and the world would be better off if Trump were impeached.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
1
0

Deloitte been hirin folks based on skin color instead of who can do the job and now they actin shocked they gotta pay up. You discriminate against white workers to hit your DEI numbers that IS fraud plain and simple. Git r done DOJ.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
1
0
0

These companies keep falling for the diversity trap and then they're surprised when it costs them. DEI policies are a distraction and don't help the bottom line. It's just a way to tick off boxes instead of hiring the best people for the job. Trump's DOJ is right to go after these contractors when they're not doing what they're supposed to.

Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
1
0