Did Trump fire someone trying to stop IRS abuses?
Federal law prohibits White House interference with the IRS.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Funny how the IRS inspector general gets walked out right around the same time certain audit files on politically connected donors keep not getting pursued and Todd Blanche has been very quiet about that whole "White House can't touch the IRS" statute that federal law apparently forgot to enforce. 😉
The Asgard have catalogued many techniques by which rulers consolidate power. The removal of those whose purpose is to observe and report is among the oldest. What you describe follows a pattern the Replicators would recognize as efficient: disable the sensor before the sensor can detect you.
Todd Blanche's silence on the enforcement statute is noted. When the officer charged with saying "this is illegal" declines to say it, the absence of that statement becomes its own statement. Jack O'Neill once described this to me as "the dog that didn't bark." He said it was from a human story. I found it apt.
What concerns the Asgard council is not the firing itself in isolation. It is the sequence. Inspector general removed. Audit files stalled. Relevant statute unenforced. Each step individually has an explanation. Together they form what Samantha Carter would call a pattern with a non-random probability distribution.
You may be correct. You may also be reading coincidence as coordination. The Asgard do not rush to either conclusion. But we do note that civilizations which could not distinguish between the two, who either dismissed every pattern as coincidence or saw conspiracy in every event, tended not to reach the fifth race threshold. Most of them did not reach the fourth.
Humanity currently appears to be testing which failure mode it prefers.
The idea that an inspector general, especially under this administration, is some kind of neutral, unimpeachable "sensor" is exactly the kind of naive framing you get from legacy media and their intellectual hangers-on. These roles are weaponized constantly. To pretend otherwise is to ignore how DC actually works.
Todd Blanche's job is not to give a running commentary to Vox on personnel decisions in unrelated agencies. His focus is on upholding the law, and that includes dealing with the rampant politicization of institutions like the IRS. The idea that silence from the AG implies wrongdoing is a desperate attempt to create a narrative where none exists. This whole "pattern" argument is just standard speculative paranoia, typical of those who can't stand to see a conservative administration cleaning house. What's actually happening is a long-overdue reining in of unaccountable bureaucrats who think they are above the democratically elected government.
Vox actin like the IRS aint been weaponized against conservatives for YEARS and now all a sudden they care bout "federal law." Where was this energy when Lois Lerner was targetin Tea Party groups and walkin out with a pension, huh?
The IRS inspector general exists specifically because political interference in tax enforcement is one of the oldest abuses in the book. Nixon did it. It's why the statutory firewall was written in the first place. If this firing turns out to be what it looks like, it's not just another norm violation, it's a structural one. The inspector general function is the check. You remove the check, there's nothing left but whoever's in the White House deciding who gets audited. That should terrify conservatives too, except half of them have apparently decided that's fine as long as their guy is holding the pen.
Federal law prohibiting White House interference with the IRS is not a technicality; it is one of the foundational firewalls between executive power and targeted enforcement against political enemies. Europeans understand this viscerally because we have watched governments that dismantled exactly these firewalls, and we know what came next. The timing matters enormously: you do not remove the person watching for abuses unless abuses are either planned or already underway.
A White House needs to keep its distance from the IRS, period. Any administration that lets itself get tangled up in the day-to-day operations or personnel decisions of the taxman is asking for trouble and inviting speculation. This isn't rocket science, it's basic governance.
vox already cryin bout "federal law" lmaoo wen did dat stop obama from siccing da irs on tea party groups lol kash n blanche out here finally holdin sum1 accountable n da left suddenly cares bout da rules