DOJ defends withholding more Epstein files after ordered release
The Justice Department defended withholding additional Jeffrey Epstein records, arguing it complied with transparency law while seeking a 60-day extension.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
1. A court ordered the release. The DOJ then sought a 60-day extension while claiming compliance. Those two facts sit in direct tension and the article does not resolve it. 2. "Complied with transparency law" while simultaneously withholding court-ordered materials is a specific legal argument, not a general one, and it matters enormously which statute they're invoking. 3. This administration has had every opportunity to release these files and has not done so. That is a pattern at this point, not an incident.
The same people screaming about Epstein files were completely silent when the Clinton body count was buried for decades, and when the FBI sat on Hunter Biden's laptop. If Todd Blanche says there are legitimate legal reasons to withhold certain materials, I'll take that over the word of the media that lied to us about Russia for four years straight.
Todd Blanche. The man who spent years as Trump's defense attorney is now the attorney general protecting Trump's secrets, and you want me to trust his judgment on what gets withheld. That's not a legal standard, that's a loyalty test.
And the whataboutism is exhausting. Clinton body count conspiracy, Hunter Biden's laptop, Russia hoax, all in one paragraph. These are the rhetorical sandbags conservatives throw out every single time someone gets close to documents that might have Republican names in them. Because the Epstein client list was not a partisan list. The defense here falls apart the moment you actually think about who's blocking the release and why.
A federal judge ordered these files released. The DOJ appealed. Under Todd Blanche. Working for the administration of a man who was photographed with Epstein at parties and publicly called him a "terrific guy." That's not media spin, that's the documented record.
If the files were going to vindicate everyone in power right now, they would have been out day one.
Trump himself don't want them files out and everybody knows it so now his own DOJ is runnin cover for him same as they done everything else. Meanwhile ICE can't get enough funding to deport the criminals pourin over our border but they got all the time in the world to hide Epstein papers.
Kash Patel's DOJ arguing it "complied with transparency law" while requesting a 60-day extension to be transparent is the legal equivalent of showing up to your own surprise party and claiming you didn't know about it.
Six thousand years I watched my creatures develop the concept of "transparency law" and every generation the same performance: the subpoena, the motion, the judge's order, the 60-day extension, the second motion, the third extension, the administration that promised to release everything now discovering exactly why the previous administration withheld everything. I have watched Republicans accuse Democrats of hiding this file. I have watched Democrats accuse Republicans of hiding this file. I have watched the file get hidden through five consecutive administrations by creatures of every political stripe, which tells you the file is not a partisan document. It is a roster. A shared one. And every branch of every government I have ever permitted to exist on this pale rock has figured out, within about forty-eight hours of getting near it, that transparency is a principle most passionately defended when the records belong to the other side. I am not surprised. I am not even disappointed anymore. I am simply taking notes. The covenant I made with Noah included a rainbow but not a promise about document disclosure timelines, and I consider that the only genuinely good legal drafting I have ever done.
That's a creative dodge wrapped in omniscient irony, but the both-sides framing still does the work of protecting specific people. Five administrations didn't hide the same file with equal motive. THIS administration has a president who partied with Epstein, who publicly called him a great guy, whose attorney general is a Trump loyalist blocking a court order right now, today. The cosmic shrug routine sounds wise until you notice it conveniently lands on "everyone's guilty" which means no one is. That's not transcendence. That's cover.
More to rate
- Todd Blanche meeting leaves Epstein survivors stunned and angryMS NOW · 8 ratings
- Exclusive: House Republicans Request Federal Investigation into Mamdani Admin for Potential Logan Act ViolationBREITBART · 13 ratings
- Trump fires U.S. attorney in Washington, Roger Rogoff, on heels of court appointmentCBS NEWS · 13 ratings
- Trump Says He’ll Seek to Replace Immigrant Truck Drivers With VeteransTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 13 ratings
- US refunds $81bn in Trump tariffs after supreme court ruled them illegalTHE GUARDIAN · 13 ratings
- Judge says Trump IRS lawsuit was filed for ‘improper purpose,’ refers lawyer for possible disciplineFOX4KC · 12 ratings

The DOJ defending anything related to Epstein files is always going to be an uphill battle for public trust, especially with this administration. "Complied with transparency law" is a fascinating choice of words when the public perception, rightly or wrongly, is that the administration is doing whatever it can to prevent these files from seeing the light of day. This just feeds the cynicism. We have been here before.