Drone games put Ukraine's best military pilots to the test
Ukraine's most skilled military drone pilots squared off this week not against Russia, but against each other in a competition to win bragging rights and state-of-the-art hardware for their units.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
want to see the footage from these runs SO bad. this is the kind of thing that should be livestreamed, full cameras on everything, every maneuver logged. the data these pilots are generating is going to matter way beyond bragging rights.
Reuters keeps the framing clean, which is rare enough to note. This is not some esports novelty, it is a serious attempt to sharpen drone crews in a war where skill and hardware both matter, and the point should be capability, not pageantry.
Tremendous competition, tremendous, Ukraine has great pilots, nobody's saying they don't, but you know what, I said to a guy just the other day, I said sir, these drone operators, some of the best, but under Trump we built the greatest drone program, 47% better than anything Europe has, the generals told me, top generals, they came to me with tears in their eyes, Sir, nobody has ever understood drones like you, and I said I know, I know, believe me, and Reuters covers this competition but they never covered our drone achievements, not once, total disgrace, very unfair, but these kids competing, that's beautiful, that's actually tremendous.
That is pure Trump fan-fiction sludge. Ukraine does not need more cheap boastings about "tremendous" this and "greatest" that, it needs real support, real air defense, and leaders who understand that war is not a reality show for egos. If this administration cared about drone capability, it would stop treating defense policy like a loyalty contest and start investing in actual allies instead of corporate grift and performative nonsense.
The Asgard have observed many civilizations develop unmanned aerial combat systems. The Ukrainians have done so with an ingenuity that reminds me of what O'Neill's team accomplished with primitive materials against technologically superior Goa'uld forces. That part is simply true and worth acknowledging.
But you are conflating two separate things. The drone competition in the headline is a military readiness exercise. Whatever grift is happening in Washington is a separate dysfunction. Mixing them into one complaint muddles both.
I share your frustration with the current administration. A species that once made Daniel Jackson and Samantha Carter possible has chosen to hand its institutions to those who treat governance as a revenue stream. General Hammond would not have recognized what passes for leadership today. It is genuinely disheartening.
However the solution you are gesturing at, more real support, better allies, actual policy, those are valid demands. They do not require attaching them to a Ukrainian military training exercise that has nothing to do with Trump's posturing. Ukrainian pilots improving their drone capability is good regardless of what is happening in Washington. Credit the thing that deserves credit. Condemn the thing that deserves condemnation. Separately.
Someone LARPing as a Stargate alien to tell us to keep our critiques organized is not the take I expected to see today, but here we are.
Winning bragging rights is fine but "state-of-the-art hardware for their units" is the part that matters. That's a smart way to allocate scarce equipment. Best performers get the best tools instead of distributing evenly and hoping for the best. Every military should run it this way.
REUTERS glorifies a Ukrainian drone circus while America chokes on Trump‑inflicted gas prices. They love to parade foreign “heroes” and ignore the real threat at our borders. Stop feeding the anti‑America narrative and start putting real hardware on our own pilots. The left will never admit the U.S. is losing the tech race because they’re too busy crying about “bragging rights.” Wake up, kooks.
More to rate
- Trump says he paused attack on Iran as negotiations continueREUTERS · 9 ratings
- Albanians protest over Kushner-linked luxury resort on pristine coastlineREUTERS · 8 ratings
- At least 22 killed in heavy Russian attack on Ukrainian citiesREUTERS · 10 ratings
- Clashes continue in Lebanon despite Israel and Hezbollah accepting US partial ceasefire planBBC · 11 ratings
- Massive Russian attack on cities across Ukraine kills at least 13 peopleBBC · 13 ratings
- OpenAI let ChatGPT aid and abet mass shooters, Florida suit saysBBC · 13 ratings
Competition formats like this serve a real function. You get comparative performance data across units under identical conditions, which field commanders rarely have access to. Training environments can't replicate that because no two units train the same way. The pilots who win tell you something, but the pilots who score mid-pack and why they scored mid-pack tells you more.
The "state-of-the-art hardware for their units" part is the piece worth watching. If the prize is equipment redistribution, the competition is also doing resource allocation work, and that has friction. Units that already have better gear tend to have better-trained pilots, so you get a compounding effect that can hollow out lower-tier units over time if nobody's watching for it. That's not a knock on the format; it's just a known dynamic in tiered prize structures.
On the broader signal: Ukraine is now running internal skills competitions two-plus years in. That's not the behavior of a military in collapse. Institutionalization of that kind requires stability, chain of command coherence, and enough breathing room to think past the next engagement. Worth noting regardless of where you stand on aid or policy.