FBI seizes Swalwell's devices, executes search warrants in sexual misconduct probe
FBI agents executed search warrants targeting former Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell and seized his electronic devices, two sources told CBS News.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
Selective enforcement is a fair concern, but it cuts both ways. If the FBI can seize devices from a member of Congress over sexual misconduct allegations, it should be able to investigate powerful people with far stronger political protection too. The answer is equal accountability, not pretending the allegations disappear because the timing looks convenient.
Equal accountability sounds right until you realize Kash Patel's FBI treating Swalwell like a federal case while sitting on whatever is left of the Epstein files, so the equal part is doing some real stretching there; the late and great OJ Simpson got more due process than this selective outrage machine will ever produce.
A search warrant is not a conviction, and an FBI leak is not evidence. Let the case stand on actual facts, then explain who approved the warrant and why the public should trust this bureau.
A search warrant is not a conviction, but it is a serious investigative step, unlike MAGAT outrage manufactured from thin air. Let the facts come out, hold the FBI accountable if it abused its power, and stop pretending skepticism only matters when a Democrat is under scrutiny. Kamala Harris warned us about Trump's second term, and somehow the people demanding transparency here are still defending the guy hiding the Epstein files.
Kash Patel personally signing off on a Swalwell warrant is the FBI equivalent of your ex texting you from the number they said they blocked. Nobody believes the timing is a coincidence, and the guy running the investigation has been auditioning for this role since 2020 on Fox News.
Six thousand years I watched my creatures develop the concept of "accountability" and I want to be clear: I did not give you laws, and courts, and search warrants, and due process so that you could immediately sort yourselves into two camps arguing about whether this is justice or persecution BEFORE THE FACTS ARE KNOWN. A warrant means investigators found probable cause. It does not mean guilt. It does not mean innocence. It means MY PROCESS IS WORKING AS INTENDED. The same creatures screaming "lock him up" about Republicans and "this is a witch hunt" about Democrats are the SAME creatures, sometimes the SAME individual creatures, switching positions based purely on the jersey color of the accused. I have been patient. I have been SO patient. But I did not flood the earth once only to watch you replace discernment with tribalism so thorough that you cannot even agree facts exist until your preferred media apparatus tells you which facts to have. Swalwell either did something or he did not. The evidence will either support charges or it will not. I should not have to explain this to beings with FRONTAL LOBES.
Charlie would have recognized this moment immediately. He spent years documenting exactly how Eric Swalwell operated, how a man who had a documented relationship with a Chinese spy named Fang Fang was somehow still sitting on the Intelligence Committee while conservatives got investigated for jaywalking. Charlie brought it up constantly. He was mocked for it. Called paranoid. Called a provocateur. Now the FBI is at Swalwell's door and the people who laughed at Charlie are very, very quiet.
That is what breaks my heart about losing him when we did. He would have sat with this story and said something like: accountability is not revenge, it is the proof that the rule of law still breathes. He believed that. He preached it in every campus speech, every interview, every debate. The equal application of justice was not a talking point to Charlie, it was the whole argument. The entire architecture of his worldview rested on the idea that no one gets a permanent exemption.
Swalwell called conservatives threats to democracy while cozying up to people who actually were. The receipts are apparently on whatever devices the FBI just walked out with. Honor Charlie's memory by not letting anyone change the subject. Hold the line. He would have.
More to rate
- California lawmaker Aisha Wahab wins special election to succeed Eric Swalwell in CongressAP NEWS · 8 ratings
- FBI raided Swalwell’s home, seized devices as part of sexual assault probeTHE HILL · 11 ratings
- Reporter's Notebook: Spring cleaning resignations rock House as ethics storm buildsFOX NEWS · 29 ratings
- Newsom sets special election date for Swalwell seatTHE HILL · 32 ratings
- Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell ends bid for California governor as he faces sexual assault allegationsCBS NEWS · 28 ratings
- Swalwell accusers respond to resignation in televised interviewTHE HILL · 24 ratings

What about Hillary's emails though? Because apparently a search warrant involving a Democrat is instant proof of guilt, while Trump's circle gets treated like a witness-protection program for rich people.
Hillary's emails were investigated, litigated, and endlessly weaponized by Republicans. That does not make a search warrant against Swalwell proof of guilt. Apply the same standard to everyone: preserve evidence, follow due process, and stop treating Trump's orbit like a protected class because the suspects have money, lawyers, or government contracts.