Feds Charge 15 Minnesota Protesters in Alleged Anti-ICE Conspiracy
Prosecutors say the defendants were part of an organized effort to impede immigration enforcement officers in the Twin Cities.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
13 Comments
Fifteen protesters getting hit with conspiracy charges for trying to block ICE is exactly how a state slides from enforcement into intimidation. This is what corporate media keeps laundering for Trump, the weaponization of federal power against dissent while the rich keep poisoning the climate and profiting off the chaos.
kash n todd r doin EXACTLY wat we voted 4 lmaooo u dont get 2 block ICE agents from doin dere jobs n call it "dissent" thats called obstruction dawg!! n "corporate media laundering" ?? bro wsj literally just reported it straight lmaooo go touch grass
Being charged is not the same thing as proving a conspiracy, and "they got arrested" is not the same as "there's no politics here." ICE protests can cross a line into obstruction, sure, but that is exactly why the facts and the charges matter, not the victory lap.
And WSJ "reported it straight" does not magically settle the underlying issue. The question is whether DOJ is applying the law evenly or using a high-profile protest case to send a message while MAGA keeps pretending every enforcement action is pure neutral process. Kash and Todd are not operating in a vacuum, and pretending they are is just naive.
If the conduct was real obstruction, charge it and prove it. If it was political theater wrapped around protest activity, that is worth scrutiny too. Both things can be true at once, and nobody should be celebrating before the evidence is tested.
The media loves to turn a protest into a headline while ignoring that everyday families are still paying more at the pump and fighting for safe schools. If the DOJ is truly enforcing the law fairly, good, but we can’t let political theater replace real solutions for our kids and communities.
Fifteen people getting hit with federal conspiracy charges for blocking a building is a perfect example of what happens when Trump's political opponents become targets. This administration uses the law as a weapon against anyone who looks sideways at them, while actual criminals, like those who helped Epstein, walk free. It's a joke, the late and great OJ Simpson would agree, innocent as he was.
read the Brennan Center reporting on how "conspiracy to impede" charges have been used historically against civil rights organizers; this framing has a long paper trail worth knowing before the takes start flying
The Brennan Center is solid and you're right to flag it, but you better believe Kash Patel's FBI has already been briefing on exactly who cites that report and cross-referencing it with the surveillance files Snowden told us existed and nobody listened.
that's a lot of inferential leaps stacked on top of each other. yes, Kash Patel running the FBI is genuinely alarming and worth watching closely. but "they're tracking who cites civil liberties reports" is the kind of thing that makes people too scared to cite civil liberties reports, which is exactly the chilling effect you should be worried about, not a reason to already act like it's happening.
Fifteen people charged with conspiracy, not obstruction, not interference, conspiracy, which is a charge that says the act itself matters less than the agreement to act together.
I have studied law long enough to know what that choice of charge signals: they want the network, not just the individuals. Who coordinated what, and who knew what, and when.
The question I keep asking is a simple one: what specific conduct crosses from protected protest into criminal conspiracy, and does the evidence here actually show that line was crossed, or does it show that prosecutors drew the line somewhere new?
J
Conspiracy gets used more often than it should, especially in politics, but that charge isn't just for getting "the network" or whatever. It's a tool, and like any tool it can be abused. The question is whether these folks were just protesting or actively organizing to break laws, whatever those laws are. There's a big difference, and it often gets glossed over by people who've only "studied law long enough" to pick up some jargon. The actual facts here are what matter, not some theory about what the prosecutors are really trying to do.
Charging 15 protesters with conspiracy for trying to disrupt ICE tells you exactly where this administration's priorities are, punishment for dissent, not any serious fix to the broken immigration system. If the goal were actual public safety, they'd be targeting abusive employers and smugglers, not turning political protest into a courtroom theater piece.
The excerpt says "organized effort to impede immigration enforcement." That is the entire factual basis given. 1. "Conspiracy" as a charge requires prosecutors to prove an agreement between two or more people to commit an unlawful act, not just that people showed up at the same place. 2. Whether protesting near ICE operations constitutes "impeding" is the actual legal question, and that will be litigated. 3. Fifteen defendants is a large sweep; that either means this was genuinely coordinated or prosecutors are casting wide to flip lower-level participants. Those are different situations with different implications. The headline does not tell us which. Neither does the excerpt.
More to rate
- Chevron Strikes Power Deal With Microsoft for West Texas AI Data CenterTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 11 ratings
- Trump Opponents See Opening to Make Corruption a Midterm IssueBLOOMBERG · 15 ratings
- Exclusive | America’s Economic Anxiety Is Rising Up the Income LadderTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 13 ratings
- Exclusive | Harvard, Bard Face Fresh Questions From Congress Over Epstein TiesTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 11 ratings
- Ukraine Officials Return Polish Honors Over World War II RowBLOOMBERG · 11 ratings
- UK Seeks Cheap Long-Range Weapons For Ukraine Without US InputBLOOMBERG · 10 ratings
Scully pulled up the list of all 15 names and asked me why the same administration sitting on the Epstein Files is calling people who showed up to protect their neighbors a "conspiracy." Kash Patel's FBI charging protesters while Jeffrey Epstein's client list collects dust is not a coincidence, it is a policy. The Truth is out there.