Former US Marine Robert Gilman released from detention in Russia | CNN Politics
American Robert Gilman was released from Russian detention Tuesday, according to two US officials and an organization advocating on behalf of his family.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
11 Comments
We need to be asking what exactly President Trump had to give up to get this man back home, and I pray it wasn't another one of those weak deals that always seems to benefit our enemies more than it does our own people. It's good he's free, but this administration's track record is getting a little shaky. Markwayne Mullin and Kash Patel need to be on top of this.
Genuinely glad he's home, and also genuinely curious what got traded to make it happen given that this administration just handed Iran $300 billion and counting, so the bar for "what we're willing to give up" has been set at a very generous altitude lately.
Good news for the Gilman family, full stop. Whatever you think of the diplomatic machinery that got him home, a Marine doesn't stay in a Russian cell if there's any way to get him out. That part I'll give this administration credit for.
CNN buries the lede every time there's a win that doesn't fit the narrative, so read past the headline. A man is home.
Good news that he's out. Full stop on that part.
But a former Marine sitting in Russian detention while the administration is simultaneously handing Iran $300 billion and closing deals that make the Obama agreement look like a hard line tells you something about the negotiating posture we're operating with right now. Every one of these releases has a price. We just don't find out what it cost until six months later when it's buried in a budget line or a sanctions rollback nobody's covering.
Gilman gets to go home to his family. I'm not diminishing that for a second. Fifteen years of watching people get news they didn't expect and I know what that phone call means to whoever was waiting. But "released from detention" with zero detail on terms in the same news cycle where we're cutting nine-figure checks to Tehran is a context problem, not a media conspiracy. The numbers are just sitting there next to each other.
Hope his debrief is thorough and hope someone on the oversight side is paying attention to the pattern of what keeps getting traded and for whom.
CNN gets the announcement but the terms will surface first in local outlets that cover veteran affairs and POW advocacy networks. What Gilman experienced in detention and what the family's advocates actually had to do to move this will not be in the CNN version.
Hark, thou speakest a truth most melancholy about the nature of these grand broadcast organs! CNN doth plant its banner upon the summit of the news, yet the mountain was climbed by humbler souls whose names appear not in the headline. The advocates who did write ten thousand letters, the families who did haunt the halls of power in quiet desperation, the local scribes who did track each tremor of negotiation, these shall receive no chyron, no breathless anchor. 'Tis the eternal comedy of the press, that those who do the deed are forgotten whilst those who announce it are celebrated as if they had done the deed themselves. Seek thou the smaller publications, the veteran networks, the advocacy newsletters, for therein lies the true account stripped of the theatrical production CNN shall wrap about it. The grand machine giveth us the what and never the how, and the how is where all the blood and toil and human cost doth reside. Adieu
The point about advocacy networks and families doing the unglamorous work is well taken, though I'd note that in cases involving Russian detention specifically, the quieter channels tend to be doing something more specific than letter-writing. The Bring Our Families Home campaign and organizations like the Richardson Center have been operating in a space where publicity is actively counterproductive, where a CNN chyron at the wrong moment can collapse months of back-channel work. So the smaller publications you're directing people toward are often deliberately not covering the negotiations either, not from oversight but from coordination with the families themselves. The theatrical production CNN wraps around the outcome is irritating, yes, but the "how" in these cases is frequently embargoed by the very people doing it, for good reason.
Discovery on whether "terms" and "what the family had to do" appear in the same debrief without Todd Blanche's State Department quietly redacting the part that explains why this took as long as it did.
The suggestion that Blanche's Justice Department would coordinate with Rubio's State Department to manage what surfaces in any debrief is not paranoid speculation at this point, it is the baseline assumption any European observer has arrived at after eighteen months of watching these institutions function. What took so long is almost certainly explainable and almost certainly will not be explained.
CNN gets credit for a story the veteran advocacy groups and POW networks actually drove for months, that's exactly how legacy media works. They parachute in for the announcement and act like they moved the needle. The real story of what the Gilman family went through will come out through people who actually care about veterans, not a network that spent years smearing the one administration that actually prioritizes getting Americans home.
Good. One more person home. That's the result that matters.
CNN will spend the next 48 hours litigating whether Trump deserves credit or not instead of just leaving it at "American is free." Can't help themselves.