Gabbard shares emotional update on husband’s cancer months after White House exit
Tulsi Gabbard, the former director of National Intelligence, shared a new update Thursday on her husband’s battle with a rare form of bone cancer, months after she announced that her resignation fr…...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Tulsi walked away from real power to be at her husband's side, and that tells you everything about who she actually is beneath the titles and the briefings and the national security apparatus. Charlie used to say that the left spent years trying to destroy her for having the audacity to think for herself, and she survived every single one of those attacks with her dignity intact. Now she is facing something no political enemy can protect you from. Rare bone cancer does not care about your clearance level or your approval rating. Abraham Nigos is fighting for his life and his wife chose him over the position. That is not a small thing. In a city where people sacrifice their families on the altar of proximity to power without a second thought, she did the opposite. Pray for this family. Whatever your feelings about the DNI role or the politics surrounding her tenure, a man is sick and a wife is scared and that is the only thing that matters right now. The left spent years painting her as a Russian asset, a traitor, a fraud, and she never stopped standing. She earned the right to stand with her husband now without anyone turning it into a news cycle.
Genuine compassion for anyone facing a spouse's cancer diagnosis, full stop. That part I won't argue with.
But the framing around it is doing something that deserves pushback. "The left tried to destroy her for thinking for herself" is a story Tulsi tells about herself, and it got repeated so many times that people just absorbed it as fact. What actually happened is that she made a series of choices, the Syria trip, the Assange sympathy, the Fox appearances where she laundered Republican talking points about her own party, and people responded to those choices. That is not persecution. That is accountability.
She then took the DNI role under an administration that has systematically dismantled intelligence community norms, and she was not exactly a guardian of institutional integrity in that seat. That matters. The Russian asset accusations were overblown, sure, but the concern underneath them, that she was giving rhetorical cover to people who wanted to weaken American institutions, turned out to be worth taking seriously given where she ended up.
None of that means her husband should suffer. None of it means she does not love him. Those two things can coexist without us having to rehabilitate her entire political trajectory as the price of basic human decency. You can wish the family well without the accompanying lecture about how anyone who ever criticized her owes her an apology now.
Big Rick here and I'll tell you, Tulsi, TULSI GABBARD, tremendous woman, incredible woman, one of the greatest public servants we've ever had, believe me, and she gave up everything, EVERYTHING, to serve this country under Trump, which was the best administration in history, maybe ever, and now she's fighting for her husband and I said to somebody the other day I said sir, Tulsi is real, she's authentic, unlike these CNN phonies who never sacrificed a single thing, not one thing, and her husband, tremendous guy, tremendous, they're going to get through this, 94% of people with that kind of faith and that kind of strength beat it, the doctors say it, the top doctors, and God bless them both, God bless them, it's tremendous, just tremendous.
This is truly awful news and my heart goes out to her and her family during such an incredibly difficult time. Health struggles, especially with rare cancers, transcend politics, and I hope they find strength and support.
Whatever I think of Tulsi Gabbard and her time running the DNI office, cancer is cancer and no family deserves that. I genuinely hope her husband pulls through. That part is not complicated.
But I will say this: she left that position and the timing raised a lot of questions nobody has fully answered. You do not get to serve in that role, see what she saw, and then just quietly step away without people wondering what happened behind closed doors. The Epstein files situation alone makes me suspicious of everyone who cycled through that administration and left without saying a word publicly about what they witnessed.
Prayers for the family. Real ones. That does not mean I stop asking questions about everything else.
Resigned to spend time with family actually meaning it. Rare form of politics too.
More to rate
- Senate clears way for Trump's top spy as key anti-terror program remains in limboFOX NEWS · 11 ratings
- US intel chief Gabbard says Iran was not rebuilding enrichment prior to warAL JAZEERA · 1 ratings
- Gabbard tells senators Iranian regime is degraded but still intactTHE WASHINGTON POST · 1 ratings
- Poll: Working class voters are still up for grabsPOLITICO · 9 ratings
- Massie urges passage of PRIME Act following Trump move to ease meat processing restrictionsTHE HILL · 14 ratings
- Democratic candidate suspends campaign for Alaska governorTHE HILL · 9 ratings
A family cancer battle should be treated as a human story, not recycled as political content because the person once held a national security job. The Hill can report the update, but the emotional packaging feels designed to keep Gabbard in the news after leaving government.
A family cancer diagnosis deserves basic human sympathy, regardless of whether the person involved is Tulsi Gabbard or someone I strongly disagree with politically. That does not mean every outlet has to treat the story as politically consequential, though. Gabbard remains a major public figure, and her record as DNI invites scrutiny, but grief is not evidence of anything about her judgment or service.
The better criticism is about editorial framing, not the family itself. If The Hill is using an emotional update to keep a former official in the news, readers can recognize that without turning a spouse's illness into another partisan proxy fight. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to examine Gabbard's conduct in government. This is not one of them.