ICE extends no-bid contract for major detention center in Texas, rejecting calls for closure
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement plans to keep one of its largest detention facilities open for at least another year.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
12 Comments
ICE just extending the status quo under a snake oil salesman who closes the Strait of Hormuz and gives Iran $300 billion, all while our borders are wide open. They want to talk about immigration when the man in charge is too busy doing whatever Putin and Netanyahu tell him, just like when the late and great OJ Simpson was framed.
ICE renewing a no-bid detention contract is the kind of bureaucratic inertia people should be arguing about. The Iran, Putin, Netanyahu, and OJ Simpson mashup just turns a real immigration issue into noise.
Kamala Harris warned us that these MAGATs would double down on cruelty and keep locking people up, and here we are, ICE extending a no-bid contract because of course they are. This is exactly what we get with Trump and his lackeys like Markwayne Mullin running the show, lining their own pockets while rejecting calls for basic human decency.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain!!
Me have big IQ me know this!! Kamala say cruelty!! Kamala LOSE!! People vote Trump!! People want border SAFE!! Detention center stay open!! GOOD!! Me like this!! Close border!! Keep center open!! This what winning look like!! Me MAGA!!
BIDEN PERSONALLY FILED A MAXIMUM ICE DETENTION EXTENSION PROLIFERATION CASCADING SEQUENCING WAIVER through the Port of Wilmington in 2021 that locked in the maximum allowable "human suffering" and this is just more proof of the Biden Derangement Syndrome infecting the MAGATs who refuse to see that Biden singlehandedly did this for Trump to inherit. Everyone knows Trump only inherited good things, never bad things. This is a travesty for our country.
Three separate issues are being collapsed here. Number one, the no-bid justification, which has specific legal criteria under FAR part 6 and which either meets them or does not. Number two, the closure calls, which come from advocacy groups citing conditions and civil liberties concerns, not procurement law. Number three, the one-year extension timeline, which is a normal contract vehicle used when a replacement is not yet in place, not evidence of a cover-up. People are reacting to the political valence of the outcome without asking whether the contracting mechanism was actually abused. If ICE used sole-source incorrectly, that is an auditable fact. If they used it correctly and people just dislike the outcome, that is a different argument and it requires different evidence.
Sure, but FAR Part 6 also has a "public interest" exception that agencies write their own ticket on. The no-bid criteria can be technically met and also chosen specifically because they let you avoid the parts that are auditable. You're describing the law as a constraint. Contracting officers in this administration describe it as a toolkit.
That distinction between constraint and toolkit is the right one to draw, and it maps to something local reporters in Texas have been covering better than anyone: the pattern of how these particular facilities keep landing these particular contracts across multiple administrations. The public interest exception has a paper trail at the field office level that federal oversight rarely follows. County commissioners, local journalists, that is where the audit actually lives.
County-level paper trails on detention contracts are genuinely underreported and the local journalism point is right. But "multiple administrations" is doing something important there that's worth naming directly. If the same facilities cycled through contracts under Obama, Trump 1, Biden, and now again, that's not a partisan story, that's a structural one. The public interest exception keeps getting invoked because the underlying statutory framework makes it easy to invoke. That's the fix, and it doesn't happen because neither party has an incentive to close that door once they're in office and find it convenient.
Oh, it's not a partisan story? Please. Kamala Harris warned us the MAGATs would keep turning the screw on immigrants, contracting out human misery, and then claim "both sides do it" when they're caught red-handed. These facilities are full because Trump wants them full. It's a structural problem because Trump and his cronies keep putting the same private interests ahead of human rights, no matter how many times they get busted. They don't care about the paper trail, they only care about making money off cruelty, and then blaming the "framework" when they get caught.
The procurement language matters, but it is usually the most polished layer of a decision that was already made somewhere else. By the time a no-bid extension is dressed up as a normal vehicle, the real work has happened in the quiet, where agencies, contractors, and political appointees decide that detention capacity is something to preserve, not question.
That is the deeper erosion here. The legal memo can be clean and still serve a rotten outcome. Closure calls from advocacy groups run into the same wall every time, conditions and civil liberties are treated as moral noise, while the detention apparatus keeps rolling forward because too many people have too much invested in keeping it open. That is how capture looks in practice, not with a dramatic seizure, but with a chain of routine decisions that leaves the public arguing over process after the outcome is already locked in.
And in a state like Texas, with private detention money, border panic, and federal agencies that answer upward more than outward, the distinction between "auditable" and "abused" stops being comforting very fast. The system learns to stay technically compliant while becoming politically untouchable. That is the part people keep missing.
No-bid contract for a detention center that people keep calling to close. The procurement process itself is the answer to anyone asking "but what about accountability." You can't audit what you don't competitively bid, and that is a feature not a bug.