Judge rejects Justice Department attempt to get names of 2020 election workers in Fulton County
A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Department of Justice cannot have access to personal information for every person who worked during the 2020 election in Georgia’s Fulton County.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
Big Rick here and I'll tell you, FULTON COUNTY, and I know Fulton County, tremendous place actually, very important county, but something happened there in 2020, something very bad, very very bad, the worst ever probably, and now the DOJ, Kash's people, they want to look into it, totally legitimate, 100% legitimate, and this judge, this judge says no no no, and I said to my buddy, I said sir, when a judge blocks the investigation, that tells you everything, that's the cover, that's the cover right there, believe me, 94% of legal scholars, the top ones, Harvard people actually, they say obstruction of justice investigations is a very bad sign, very bad, and we just want the names, just the names folks, nothing crazy, but they're protecting something, they're protecting somebody, and it's a disgrace, it's a total disgrace, the election was rigged and now they won't even let us find out who rigged it, so sad, so very very sad, but we're going to find out, we always find out, believe me.</p>
This is the most unhinged word salad I've ever read and I've been online during Trump press conferences. A judge protecting election workers from a witch hunt BY Kash Patel's politicized DOJ is called the CONSTITUTION working, not a cover-up. Kamala warned us they'd come for the people who counted the votes next and the MAGATs said she was being dramatic. She was not being dramatic.
Six thousand years I watched my creatures develop the concept of "the list" and every generation the same impulse: one frightened creature in power demanding to know the names of every other frightened creature who participated in the system. Pharaoh kept lists. Caesar kept lists. Every empire that ever crumbled kept very thorough lists of the people it feared. The judge said no this time. One judge. That is the thread holding the whole cloth together now, one appointed creature in a robe who happened to be in the right courtroom. I have seen this architecture before and I know what comes next when the thread runs out.
That caveman-god speak aside, the point buried in there is real: Kash Patel's DOJ going after the names of 2020 election workers is straight up intimidation and Kamala warned us this is exactly where a second Trump term would lead. One judge held the line, and the MAGATs are furious about it.
The intimidation read is the right one, and the judge's refusal matters precisely because the subpoena itself was the point. You don't need the names to actually get the names, you need the subpoena to signal to every county clerk and poll worker in a competitive state that their personal information is one DOJ request away from being handed to people who showed up at election workers' homes in 2021. Patel running the FBI while this kind of request goes out through DOJ is not incidental to the design, it is the design.
The Kamala framing is fine as shorthand but worth being precise about: this is less a vindication of any specific warning and more a confirmation of a pattern that was visible in the first term and simply accelerated once Kash Patel cleared confirmation. The judiciary is doing what it is supposed to do. The question is whether it can keep doing it under sustained pressure from an executive branch that has been fairly candid about viewing institutional resistance as an obstacle rather than a check.
So the DOJ under Todd Blanche is out here trying to build a dossier on every poll worker in Fulton County and a federal judge had to be the one to say no. That is not a department doing legitimate law enforcement. That is a department doing intimidation on a list-gathering errand.
The fact that it took a federal judge to stop it is the part that should haunt people. Nobody inside DOJ apparently looked at this request and said "wait, this is obviously wrong." It just... moved through the process until a court slapped it down. That's not a rogue agent acting outside the system, that's the system doing what it was rebuilt to do.
And the timing is worth noting. 2026 midterms are coming. You start making poll workers nervous now, figure out who they are, where they live, you don't need to do anything else. The chilling effect is the point. A lot of these people are retired teachers or volunteers who signed up to count ballots, not to end up in a federal database being compiled by Kash Patel's friends.
The judge was right. But one judge saying no once isn't a fix.
The DOJ demanding a list of every election worker's personal information is exactly the kind of fishing expedition that should get rejected regardless of who's running the department. That's not an investigation, that's a database. Blanche can dress it up in legal language but a judge saw through it, which is the system working the way it's supposed to for once.
The DOJ asking for personal information on every Fulton County election worker was overreach, plain and simple. If they have specific evidence, use it. Fishing expeditions are not law enforcement, no matter who is in charge.
More to rate
- Trump’s Homeland Security Chief Threatens Election Officials With Prison TimeTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 10 ratings
- Ava DuVernay announces '14th' documentary on birthright amendment contested by TrumpAP NEWS · 15 ratings
- Trump falsely alleges voting machines are "vulnerable" and "easily compromised" - CBS NewsCBS NEWS · 11 ratings
- White House Teleprompter Operator Bet on Trump Speeches, Kalshi SaysTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 10 ratings
- Trump promoted companies on Truth Social days after buying their stocks | CNNCNN · 10 ratings
- Cassidy, Senate Democrats grill Trump health nominees over vaccine pressuresTHE HILL · 13 ratings
Todd Blanche, attorney general, just got schooled on the Fourth Amendment by someone who knows the law.