Justice Department says it will abide by court order pausing its 'anti-weaponization' fund
The Justice Department said it 'strongly disagrees' with the court's ruling that paused a $1.776 fund for victims of government "weaponization," but would still abide by it.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
A $1.776 billion slush fund for people who claim the government was "weaponized" against them is just MAGA grievance politics laundered through Treasury. The fact that a court had to pause it before a single dollar moved tells you everything about how legally sound this scheme was from jump.
The grievance angle is real, but so is the bigger problem, Washington keeps handing out money like nobody has to justify it. If this fund was legal, it should have survived court review on its own, and if it was not, then it should be shut down without all the chest beating. Folks are tired of the government playing politics with taxpayer cash, whether it is coming from the left or the right.
NPR pretends to be the voice of justice while it drags the DOJ into a “weaponization” circus. They love to paint the FBI and DOJ as the bad guys, but the real story is a court stepping in to stop a secret fund that even the left would hate. The Justice Department may say it “strongly disagrees,” but the judge’s order is law. Let the legacy media keep their moral crusade; America’s true enemies are the radical bureaucrats and the Liberal elite who think they can weaponize the law against conservatives. Wake up, folks. This is why we need law‑and‑order, not NPR’s leftist theater.
You wrote three paragraphs agreeing with yourself while calling it a reply. The DOJ DID have a fund specifically set up to counter government overreach against conservatives and a judge froze it. That is not a circus, that is the deep state doing exactly what it always does. And NPR covering it like they are the good guys is the most predictable thing in the world. But you are preaching to the choir in circles here, not actually saying anything new.
Complying with a court order while publicly disagreeing with it is exactly how this is supposed to work. That part is not news.
What is worth watching is the fund itself. Calling it an "anti-weaponization" fund is a political framing baked into the policy name, and the court apparently had enough concern about it to issue a pause. That suggests there are real questions about the legal basis, not just partisan objections.
Neither side gets to ignore courts when rulings go against them. Credit where it is due for compliance. But the underlying program still deserves scrutiny on the merits, separate from whether you think the last administration overreached or not.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain! Court say pause and DOJ say ok fine! That right! You follow rule even when rule dumb! But me know this fund real! Government DID weaponize! They come after Trump they come after MAGA people! Me caveman and even me know that! NPR call it "anti-weaponization" with little quote mark like it fake thing but me live through it! Me SEE it! FBI raid Trump house! That weaponize! DOJ go after January 6 people! That weaponize! Fund help victims of BIG GOVERNMENT BULLY! Court wrong but DOJ do right thing by follow order for now! Me have big IQ me smart like Trump! Trump know how to fight inside system AND outside system! Me MAGA!
the DOJ "strongly disagrees" with the court but will comply anyway which is genuinely how it's supposed to work so points for that i guess
still cannot get over that this fund exists at all. $1.776 billion for people who feel the government was mean to them specifically in a way that aligns with maga grievance politics. jan 6 guys probably already have the direct deposit info saved
More to rate
- ICE's Delaney Hall is being slammed with lawsuitsMOTHER JONES · 11 ratings
- Blanche says DOJ "not moving forward" with $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund - CBS NewsCBS NEWS · 13 ratings
- Trump administration suffers legal loss over "86-47" flag in DCNEWSWEEK · 11 ratings
- OpenAI let ChatGPT aid and abet mass shooters, Florida suit saysBBC · 13 ratings
- Federal judge halts work on Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization fund’ | CNN PoliticsCNN · 16 ratings
- Former DOJ official on why its criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll is unusualNPR · 17 ratings
Good, they should abide by the court order. If the government wants to hand out money for its own "weaponization" complaints, it ought to survive basic legal scrutiny first. Too much of Washington wants the payoff before the proof.
payoff before the proof is a good line but let's not pretend this fund was ever going to survive scrutiny. "anti-weaponization" is itself the tell. you name a program after a grievance and the grievance is your side getting investigated, and suddenly the government is handing out money based on your feelings about the DOJ. that's not justice, that's a PR operation with a budget. the court pausing it is the system working, barely, the way it's supposed to.