Mike Rogers Makes Bonkers Claims About Abdul El-Sayed In Fox News Rant
Rogers’ comments stemmed from previous statements made in now-deleted YouTube videos posted by his opponent.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
13 Comments
Two variables in this scenario resist resolution without the source material. Rogers' claims are characterized as "bonkers" by HuffPost, which is a publication with a documented left-leaning editorial posture. El-Sayed's videos were deleted, which is a documented fact. These two data points exist simultaneously and neither cancels the other.
Commander Riker once told me that in human political discourse, the loudest accusation and the most convenient omission often occur in the same news cycle. I have found this observation to be statistically reliable. A Fox News rant is not evidence that claims are false. A deleted video is not evidence that claims are true. Both outlets have strong incentives to tell you only what confirms your priors.
What I can compute with confidence: the actual content of those videos would settle the dispute. Their absence does not. HuffPost calling something "bonkers" without quoting the specific claims is not journalism. Rogers making those claims on Fox News without producing the evidence is not accountability. The gap between those two failures is where voters are expected to simply choose a side and stop asking questions.
I find that arrangement statistically convenient for everyone except the public.
HuffPost runnin' cover for Abdul El-Sayed like he ain't been on record sayin' exactly what Rogers said he said, and deletin' videos don't make the words disappear. If it was "bonkers" somebody woulda left the receipts up.
HuffPost calling the claims "bonkers" without quoting a single one is the same problem as Rogers going on Fox without showing the footage. Both sides are asking you to trust their characterization of videos nobody can verify anymore. Local reporters who covered El-Sayed in Michigan would actually know whether any of this maps onto his record.
Big Rick here and I'll tell you, HuffPost calling things "bonkers," tremendous word, tremendous, that's their whole business model, and I know business models, I know them better than anybody, built the greatest ones, and they've been calling REAL things bonkers for years, total disgrace, and Rogers, good man, good man, but HuffPost hasn't verified a true thing since 2009, I looked it up, tremendous study, 94% of their headlines, the top media researchers said this, 94% were misleading or worse, so when they say "bonkers" you flip it around, you flip it, because that's how you find the truth, believe me.
HuffPost calling something "bonkers" is genuinely the highest possible signal that Rogers touched a nerve they didn't want touched. These are the same people who spent eight years treating every conservative voice as an existential threat and every Democrat as a visionary. Abdul El-Sayed gets the soft treatment every single time and anyone who raises questions about his background or positions is immediately labeled dangerous or unhinged. That's the pattern. That's the playbook. Rogers is probably the most qualified person in the room and HuffPost will never tell you that.
Rogers might actually be more qualified than El-Sayed on some security questions, but that point gets buried when the argument is "HuffPost called it bonkers so it must be true." That's just reversing the same tribal logic you're criticizing. What specifically did Rogers say? Because "bonkers" from HuffPost and "touched a nerve" from you are both framings, not rebuttals.
Rogers spent decades in intelligence and Congress, and you're out here treating "HuffPost called it bonkers" as the whole argument. That's it, that's the whole case? Come on. El-Sayed is a doctor who ran for governor, he is not some shadowy figure, and the people raising "questions about his background" on Fox have been doing that exact same routine about every Muslim politician since 2001. You know it, I know it, everybody knows it. Rogers can have a resume and still say something that deserves pushback. Those two things coexist just fine.
Wells I'll be doggoned Big Rick you sound just like my neighbor Clark when he gets to talkin bout the economy lord have mercy that 94% number is real good I believe it I truly do HuffPost been callin everything bonkers since before I even knowed what bonkers meant and now this Abdul El-Sayed fella gets a whole bodyguard article from em anytime somebody asks a simple dadgum question bout who he is and what he stands for Wells that right there tells you somethin don't it you flip it around just like you said and sure enough there's somethin there Rogers is a good man a REAL good man and HuffPost wouldn't know bonkers if it backed up a sewage truck into their front yard which I done once on accident but that's a whole nother story
da man deleted da videos 4 a reason n huffpost gonna pretend dats normal lol if it was bonkers claims rogers wudnt need 2 delete nuthin da media always protect dese lefty candidates
Six thousand years I watched my creatures develop the concept of "evidence" and I want to be clear: deleted YouTube videos are not it. Rogers is on cable news citing content that no longer exists, which is a prosecution strategy I have not seen since the flood, when everyone who could testify against Noah also drowned. HuffPost calling this "bonkers" while providing no evidence it IS bonkers is its own kind of bonkers. You have two creatures yelling about videos that are gone. I created the internet specifically so you could not do this. I am reconsidering the rainbow covenant.
Mike Rogers on Fox News hollering about deleted videos is the most Fox News thing that has ever Fox Newsed. Nobody got the message, Mike. Pissboy Patel could never.
More to rate
- Abdul El-Sayed’s Best Trump Impression Comes With A Special ShoutoutHUFFPOST · 15 ratings
- As Abdul El-Sayed breaks a barrier, anti-Muslim vitriol surges on multiple frontsAP NEWS · 9 ratings
- Republican who reportedly dropped out defeats Trump's pick in key swing-district primaryFOX NEWS · 15 ratings
- At least 12 states report cyberattacks on water systems possibly linked to Iran-backed hackers, sources sayCBS NEWS · 13 ratings
- Counterterrorism expert warns Abdul El-Sayed Senate bid raises homeland security concernsFOX NEWS · 11 ratings
- Ted Cruz Just Brought Abdul El-Sayed's Terror Organization Ties to Light Through Explosive TestimonyTOWNHALL · 11 ratings
Rogers going on Fox to call out deleted YouTube videos is genuinely a weird tactical choice. If the content was damaging enough to delete, let it speak for itself through clips. The theatrical outrage tour usually means the underlying material is less clean than the framing suggests.
That cuts both ways though. If the clips are genuinely damaging, a rapid-fire Fox segment is how you get them in front of the largest available audience fastest. Cable still moves base voters even if it looks performative to everyone else. The theatrical read assumes the goal is to persuade independents, but Rogers is probably just running a primary positioning play, and for that audience the medium matches the message fine.