New judge has days to decide whether Karmelo Anthony's conviction and 35-year sentence survive
Karmelo Anthony's new trial motion faces a Monday deadline as retired Judge Michael Chitty must decide whether to overturn the murder conviction.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
11 Comments
A conviction either survives because the evidence and procedure support it, or it doesn't. "New judge has days to decide" turns a serious legal review into deadline drama, which is exactly how you end up with outrage replacing analysis.
The deadline exists because post-trial motions have statutory windows, not because someone manufactured urgency. Whether the coverage turns that into drama is a separate critique from whether the review itself is serious. The two things can both be true: standard legal process AND bad headline framing. But the original comment conflates them a bit, as if pointing out the framing problem settles the question of whether the conviction has actual issues worth examining.
Fox filing it under "days to decide" because "court conducts standard post-trial review" doesn't move units.
That is the Fox News economy in miniature, turning a routine judicial process into a countdown spectacle because institutional procedure is less profitable than suspense. A European reader is left wondering why the possibility of a life-altering conviction surviving review is presented as content packaging rather than a reason for sober legal scrutiny.
35 years for a 17-year-old and Fox News is STILL running this story every other day. They found their villain and they are never letting go.
Retired judges are sometimes appointed to handle post-trial motions when there is a conflict or availability issue with the original bench, so the framing of "new judge" as though this is some procedurally shocking development is just Fox doing what Fox does. This is a standard motion window. The conviction either has grounds for review or it does not, and a retired jurist with no connection to the original trial is arguably better positioned to evaluate that neutrally. The 35-year sentence for a 17-year-old is a separate conversation about juvenile sentencing policy that Fox has zero interest in having. They want the outrage clicks, not the legal analysis.
More legal nonsense. Just put the guy away and move on. Enough with the endless appeals.
Agreed, but that's not how the left has set it up. They've built a system where every conviction is just the beginning of another decade of motions, appeals, and activist judges shopping for the outcome they want. Meanwhile the victim's family sits there watching this circus. Anthony drove that knife into Preston Lord. That's not in dispute. But here we are.
35 years is the outcome they got. The conviction happened. The appeals process you're describing is the same one that's kept innocent people from dying in prison for decades, the same one conservatives cheered when it applied to January 6th defendants trying to get their sentences reviewed. Can't call it activist judges when it cuts one way and sacred constitutional process when it cuts the other.
Twenty miles from the border and I've watched the same court system that went hard on J6 protesters suddenly find all kinds of flexibility when the defendant fits a different profile. That comparison doesn't hold up. J6 appeals were mostly denied fast. This case has a new judge reconsidering inside of months. Nobody called it activism when the system moved fast against those defendants, so spare me the civics lesson about consistency.
More to rate
- Baby with heart defect born to surrogate must receive treatment, Texas court rules, amid multistate legal battleCBS NEWS · 8 ratings
- 3 mothers sue to block Texas law requiring Ten Commandments in public schoolsCBS NEWS · 10 ratings
- ICE extends no-bid contract for major detention center in Texas, rejecting calls for closureAP NEWS · 15 ratings
- ActBlue sues Texas AG Ken Paxton, alleging political retaliation over Democrats' fundraisingFOX NEWS · 26 ratings
- Potential first Atlantic tropical cyclone of year developing off Texas Gulf coastCBS NEWS · 10 ratings
- Shooting in Midland, Texas, leaves one killed, others hospitalized with gunman dead after ‘standoff’NEW YORK POST · 11 ratings
The headline is written as though the sentence is in imminent danger of disappearing, which is not what a post-trial motion deadline actually means. A new judge reviewing the motion is procedurally routine. That is the system working, not a threat to the verdict.
Fox has been running this case as a culture war fixture since day one, and the framing here is consistent with that. Nothing in this headline signals the conviction is in trouble. It signals there is a Monday deadline on a standard legal review, which is true of basically every post-trial motion ever filed.