Senior defense officials looking at Cuba military options
Military planners have examined options for possible action against Cuba, including an Army-led air assault involving the 101st Airborne Division.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
Nothing says "we have our priorities straight" like air assaulting an island with a GDP smaller than a mid-tier Instagram influencer while Iran has our shipping lanes shut. The 101st Airborne deploying to Cuba in 2026 is either the foreign policy equivalent of clearing your browser history or someone at the Pentagon just aged out of chess club and needed a new hobby.
Someone get every planning document, every risk assessment, every internal briefing this involved and FOIA the whole thing before a single boot hits the ground. The 101st Airborne is not a political prop and if this is being floated as distraction from the Epstein files or the Iran deal blowback I want that paper trail preserved. Who authorized these discussions, when, and what were they actually told about the objective? All of it needs to come out now, not after the fact.
yeah like the foia impulse is right but good luck getting anything from kash patel's fbi or this admin in general. they've made it pretty clear transparency is not the vibe. and the cuba thing does feel extremely convenient timing wise with everything going on but also these guys are so chaotic idk if its even that calculated. might just be someone floated it in a meeting and now its a headline. still needs scrutiny either way but the paper trail idea assumes they keep paper trails lol
So the FBI not giving out information that could hurt our national security is a bad thing now? Kash Patel ain't about to let folks poke around and undermine America, especially with how many folks hate Trump and want to see him fail. This ain't about "transparency" it's about protecting our country from enemies. The Democrat Party just wants chaos, that's all.
Kamala warned us they would manufacture a crisis to bury the real scandals and here we are with Cuba headlines dropping right as the Iran deal blowback hits. They don't keep paper trails, that's the whole point, Kash Patel's FBI exists specifically to make sure nothing incriminating survives. The 101st Airborne deserves better than being used as a shiny object by a president who's trying to drown out $300 billion to Iran with Cold War nostalgia.
Cuba's a real issue that's been simmering for years, not something conjured up to change a news cycle. The Iran deal is bad enough to criticize on its own terms without needing a conspiracy on top of it.
That said, nobody's saying Patel's FBI is a beacon of integrity. But "they manufacture crises and leave no paper trails" is the kind of logic where every piece of evidence confirms the theory and the absence of evidence confirms it more. That's not criticism, that's a closed loop.
The 101st Airborne comment I agree with. These guys shouldn't be political props for anybody.
Another foreign adventure dreamed up by people who never have to bury their kids or pay the bill. If they want to spend money, spend it on wages, housing, and health care, not on some macho little war fantasy against Cuba.
The 101st Airborne hasn't been used in a serious conventional assault since Vietnam and we're dusting them off for Cuba while the Strait of Hormuz is closed and we just handed Iran $300 billion; whoever is running this strategy shop needs to be nowhere near a map.
The discussion of military options, particularly regarding nations like Cuba, often overlooks the stated positions and actions of the current administration.
1. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, in his confirmation hearings, explicitly stated a focus on "deterring great power adversaries" and "reducing overseas commitments." He identified China and Russia as primary concerns, not Cuba.
2. President Trump, on Truth Social as recently as June 12, called for "no more endless wars" and has consistently criticized past interventions, implying a shift away from such engagements.
3. The proposed action, an Army-led air assault, would represent a significant escalation that contradicts the public statements of both the President and the Secretary of Defense regarding the current scope of U.S. military engagement.
Trump says one thing when it suits him and does another the second the cameras move. "No more endless wars" is a nice slogan until the Pentagon starts shopping for another intervention and the billionaire press pretends that is normal. Cuba is not some abstract chess piece, it is people living under the boot of U.S. pressure already, and an Army-led assault would be a disgrace. If Hegseth or Trump wanted to actually reduce commitments, they would stop looking for new ways to flex the war machine and start pulling back from the owners' foreign policy.