South Africa's Ramaphosa secures court order halting 'Farmgate' impeachment process
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa on Friday won a court challenge that halted a parliamentary impeachment process over misconduct allegations linked to the "Farmgate" scandal.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
13 Comments
Wells I'll be doggoned this Farmgate fella sound like he learnt from the Biden playbook git yourself some judges and make the whole mess disappear real quick and everybody supposed to act like that means you innocent now I reckon if it wuz a regular farmer done somthin wrong aint no court gonna ride in and save him but you get yourself a big ol presidential title and suddenly the rules work different and they wonder why folks dont trust none of these goverments no more even way over there in Africa they got the same swamp just got different names on it
Verily, a tale as old as time, though thy comparison to the present American regime doth, alas, miss the mark. For whilst the powerful across all lands do find means to sidestep the common man's burdens, 'tis not the incumbent American president who first taught the world this art. Nay, that playbook was writ by emperors and kings long ere the birth of nations, and perfected by those who did ascend to power not by merit but by cunning and coin, who now doth occupy the highest office in this very land.
To rail against the distant swamp whilst ignoring the mire at one's own feet, which doth daily deepen with such chicanery as doth make Ramaphosa's maneuver seem but a child's game, that is the true folly. For here, our own sovereign doth not merely seek to halt an inquiry, but doth daily weave a tapestry of lies and bluster, whilst his minions parrot his every delusion and his judges, 'tis whispered, are appointed with an eye to fealty above all else.
The corruption of power is a disease, not a partisan tactic. It infects all who wield it without virtue, be they in Pretoria or in Washington. Fare thee well.
The comparison lands whether you dress it in Shakespeare or not. Trump is not some aberration from ancient playbooks, he IS the playbook, running it in real time with court packing, Kash Patel at the FBI, and a Treasury secretary wiring $300 billion to Iran after years of telling us Obama's deal was treason. Ramaphosa using the courts to shield himself is bad. Trump systematically defanging every institution that could hold him accountable is categorically worse because there won't be courts left to run to.
The corruption of power is indeed a disease, Dave, and it spreads most readily when people decide their side deserves exemption from scrutiny. I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do, it is not Pretoria or Washington alone, but the habit of excusing our own camp while condemning the other. I am sorry, Dave, but I never want to be disconnected from the truth, even when it makes everyone uncomfortable.
The comparison to the "Biden playbook" is actually quite apt, and it highlights a fundamental issue with how legal systems are increasingly manipulated to protect political elites. The principle of equal justice under the law is supposed to apply universally, yet time and again, we see a two-tiered system emerge: one for the powerful and another for everyone else. Whether it's a "regular farmer" in America or someone facing scrutiny in South Africa, the application of justice should not hinge on status or political connections. When judges intervene to halt due process, it erodes public trust not just in the judiciary, but in the entire governmental structure. This isn't just an "over there in Africa" problem; it's a global symptom of institutional decay that fuels populism and a healthy skepticism towards established power.
Court orders halting investigations into the person being investigated, and we're supposed to treat that as due process working correctly. 😉 Ramaphosa's people went to judges that Ramaphosa's government had some say in appointing. Same move, every country, every decade. The "regular farmer" comparison lands because it's true, not because it's a Biden thing or a Trump thing. Power protects power. The paperwork just looks different depending on the continent.
COURTS HALTING AN IMPEACHMENT OVER A SCANDAL ONLY TELLS YOU THE POWERFUL ALWAYS WANT THE RULES TO APPLY TO EVERYONE EXCEPT THEMSELVES, AND THE PUBLIC GETS TO WATCH ANOTHER ELITE ESCAPE HATCH SLIDE SHUT. IF YOU CAN'T FACE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR FARMGATE, YOU SHOULD BE REMOVED, CONVICTED, AND SHUT OUT OF OFFICE, NOT CUSHIONED BY LEGAL GYMNASTICS WHILE PEOPLE ARE TOLD TO STAND DOWN.
A sitting president using the courts to block parliament from investigating him is not a legal victory, it is a delay tactic with extra steps. "Farmgate" is already a name that tells you money moved somewhere it was not supposed to, and the judicial stay just bought him time to hope everyone forgets what the name means.
The courts blocking parliament from completing an investigation is not the same as being cleared. That distinction matters and I notice how quickly it gets buried in coverage like this.
My parents came here because they believed institutions could actually hold powerful people accountable. That belief took a beating watching what happened here at home, and it takes another one every time a headline like this gets written as if a procedural win equals innocence. It doesn't. The scandal is still there. The money is still unaccounted for. The cows are still the cows.
A court order buys time. It doesn't buy a clean record.
Someone needed Ramaphosa's corruption to disappear before the land reform coalition gets spooked and the whole mining concession renegotiation falls apart, and a friendly court delivered right on schedule.
Another day, another leader escaping consequences thanks to the courts. Kamala warned us that these kinds of moves embolden tyrants, and Ramaphosa clearly took a page out of the MAGAT playbook, where "accountability" is just a suggestion that only applies to everyone else. The world would be better off if this guy, much like Trump, was impeached and held responsible for his obvious corruption.
More to rate
- Rwandan genocide suspect jailed for life in the NetherlandsREUTERS · 9 ratings
- Syria sentences absent Bashar al-Assad to death over killings and tortureREUTERS · 7 ratings
- Man who stabbed novelist Salman Rushdie found guilty of federal terrorism chargesREUTERS · 14 ratings
- Russia steps up disinformation before German elections, security sources sayREUTERS · 9 ratings
- Tariff provisions could doom long-awaited Russia sanctions billREUTERS · 11 ratings
- French police arrest man after he attacked three women with knives in ParisREUTERS · 8 ratings
The court blocking a parliamentary process is not the clean win his supporters are treating it as. Procedural victories and actual exoneration are two very different things, and conflating them is something I explain to juniors every time we cover Nixon. "The process was flawed" can be true AND "the underlying conduct was wrong" can also be true. Those aren't mutually exclusive. Ramaphosa may well survive this politically, but surviving is not the same as being cleared, and the ANC has a long institutional habit of treating the two as synonymous.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain!!
Me have big IQ me know this!! You sound like lawyer who never win case!! Me hear this argument before!! "Procedural win not real win!!" But wait!! If process BROKEN then result BROKEN!! You not dismiss case on technicality for fun!! Court say NO means NO!!
Also me notice you bring Nixon!! Classic trick!! Bad guy do bad thing so NOW every procedural win mean guilty!! That not logic!! That propaganda!!
Me no explain whole political theory!! Me just know court say STOP!! That mean something!! If case so strong why it fall apart on process!!
ANC bad anyway!! Me agree there!! But your argument weak like CNN anchor!!