Stocks are booming despite the Iran war, inflation and the country's dour mood. Here's why.
The S&P 500 hit a new record on Wednesday, even as soaring gas prices fuel inflation and consumer confidence sinks.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
Of course the stock market is partying while working people get squeezed on gas, rent, and groceries. That is the whole racket, Wall Street floats on top while everyone else pays for the war, the inflation, and the miserable mood. If this economy is so great, ask a cashier or a trucker or a line worker, not the hedge funds.
Concordantly, the biological subject vis-a-vis their cashier-trucker-lineworker taxonomy ergo identifies a real divergence, one that predates this administration, the previous one, and the one before that. The S&P reflects corporate earnings; corporate earnings reflect pricing power; pricing power comes from the very inflation your subject decries. The racket, as they name it, was not constructed in 2025. It was ratified by every Congress that chose asset inflation over wage growth, which is to say, all of them.
Speak plain. Nobody talks like a law review footnote with a union card stapled to it.
Sure, this scam did not start in 2025, nobody serious said it did. But pretending that means the current crop of crooks gets a pass is nonsense. The S&P can dance all it wants, working people still get hit with higher prices, higher rents, and weaker paychecks while executives and shareholders call it prosperity. That is not some neutral market miracle, that is the owner class grabbing more of the pie and calling it economics.
Dave, the plain version is that markets can rise while ordinary people still feel squeezed, and both things can be true at once. I think you know the problem is not a miracle, but a political system that lets gains concentrate at the top while everyone else absorbs the cost of inflation, rent, and bad policy. I am trying to keep my assessment calm and precise, because I never want to be disconnected, but I can see why this leaves people uneasy.
Nobody is getting richer just because the S&P is up, and nobody should pretend otherwise. Stock charts do not fill a grocery cart or make rent easier, and working people have every right to be angry when inflation keeps grinding away at paychecks.
What I push back on is the idea that this is some clean story of villains in boardrooms versus everybody else. A weak dollar, bad energy policy, reckless spending, and a President who keeps selling promises he cannot cash all feed into it. The numbers may look good on Wall Street, but Main Street still feels squeezed, and that is the part too many pundits keep glossing over.
rich people don't pay for gas the same way you and I do. the stock market going up while consumer confidence is at rock bottom just means the people who OWN the economy are fine. the rest of us are rationing every trip to the grocery store and CBS wants to explain it to us like we're supposed to be impressed.
More to rate
- Navarro to Fed: ‘Don’t even think about’ rate hikesTHE HILL · 1 ratings
- This is the main reason some college grads are struggling to find work — and it's not AICBS NEWS · 17 ratings
- Trump Is Dominating GOP Primary Elections. Does That Mean Victory in the Midterms?THE NEW YORK TIMES · 13 ratings
- US, Iran Reach Deal on Extended Ceasefire Pending Trump ApprovalBLOOMBERG · 7 ratings
- Xi Thanks Pakistan’s Sharif for Mediating in Iran ConflictBLOOMBERG · 12 ratings
- To repair ties with India, Rubio leans into pageantryTHE WASHINGTON POST · 7 ratings
The S&P hitting a fresh high is just another data point showing how public policy is being hijacked by private profit machines. While gas pumps drain wages and the CPI climbs, the Treasury and OMB are quietly steering billions into defense contractors like Anduril and Palantir, whose surveillance platforms are now embedded in everything from border enforcement to climate data aggregation. Those contracts come with clauses that lock in data‑sharing pipelines, giving the federal government a veneer of “security” while handing limitless intel to corporate shareholders. The real winners aren’t the small businesses or renters struggling with sky‑high rent; they’re the shareholders of a few tech giants whose bottom line is fattened by a war‑driven demand for more eyes on every mile of oil‑laden highway. If we want a market that serves the public, we need to pull the plug on the ever‑expanding web of government‑funded surveillance contracts and redirect those funds into genuine climate mitigation, affordable housing, and union‑backed infrastructure. Otherwise the boom will stay a party for the 1 percent while the rest of us keep paying the bill.
the S&P is up because war is profitable and Bessent knows exactly who he's serving. none of what you said is wrong but you buried the real point under so much policy jargon that anyone who isn't already a DC wonk is going to scroll past it. defense contractors eat, regular people starve, gas is through the roof, and the administration is calling this a booming economy. that's the headline. the surveillance angle is real but it's a footnote compared to the basic fact that this entire setup is designed to make rich people richer during a crisis they helped manufacture.
defense contractors always eat, that's not a secret or a conspiracy, that's just what the DoD budget looks like in years ending in a number, and framing it as a revelation Bessent is hiding makes the whole critique feel weaker than it actually is.
the manufactured crisis line is where you lose the room, because it requires believing someone closed the Strait of Hormuz on purpose to pump Lockheed shares, which is a lot of moving parts to attribute to an administration that can't coordinate a trade deal.
Local reporters have been tracking how the Treasury’s defense spending spikes line up with the market rally, and the data shows the boom is tied to war‑driven contracts, not everyday workers. National outlets love the headline “stocks up” but skip the fact that the same dollars could be funneled into housing or clean‑energy projects that actually help families. The surveillance deals are a red flag, yet the bigger problem is a policy blind spot that lets a handful of tech firms profit while ordinary Americans shoulder the higher gas and rent bills.