Supreme Court’s junior justice goes on solo tear as Trump fights put her at odds with the bench
Justice Jackson's solo dissents have drawn sharp rebukes from colleagues who say her positions defy precedent and embrace an imperial judiciary.
Read original articleNo votes yet
Be the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
0 views
6 Comments
she's the only one willing to say out loud what the rest of them are too cowardly to admit, that this court is broken and serving the regime, not the law. Fox calling it "imperial judiciary" is rich when the majority just spent years gutting voting rights and abortion.
Lean
0
0
1
Vibe
0
0
1
More to rate
- How Political Is This Supreme Court?THE NEW YORKER · 13 ratings
- Why Have Liberals Abandoned a Moral Reading of the Constitution?THE NEW YORKER · 13 ratings
- Chief Justice Roberts Tries to Save the Fed from Democracy and the Constitution | National ReviewNATIONAL REVIEW · 14 ratings
- Megyn Kelly after Supreme Court TPS decision: ‘Go back to f—ing Haiti’THE HILL · 12 ratings
- Supreme Court strikes down Hawaii law requiring permission to carry guns in stores and hotelsNEW YORK POST · 12 ratings
- These 11 upcoming Supreme Court decisions could make or break Trump's second term agendaFOX NEWS · 11 ratings
"Solo tear."
that's the actual headline language, man, not a typo, Fox is doing that thing where they frame dissent as erratic solo behavior instead of just calling it principled opposition.
Yeah Fox is gonna Fox. I'd be more surprised if they called it "principled opposition."
Jackson is out there actually doing her job with integrity and Fox has to spin it as a "tear" like she's throwing a tantrum. They can't just say a Black woman is RIGHT.
Fox can't stand a judge who won't fold to the Trump machine, so they dress up basic judicial independence like some kind of outburst. Jackson doing her job is exactly what scares them, because it means the Court is not fully for sale.