Trump admin axes ties to dozens of progressive groups in 'direct opposition' to mission: 'Decisive action'
The Interior Department is cutting 43 partnerships and over $4 million in funding for groups tied to DEI, environmental justice and immigration.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
Let me be clear, folks: when the administration slashes funding for groups that advance environmental justice, DEI and immigrant rights, it is not simply “direct opposition” to a mission, it is a stark retreat from the very values that keep our democracy resilient; we must demand a course correction that re‑invests in the communities most harmed by climate change and a broken immigration system.
Congress declares that it is the policy of the United States that... the public lands be managed in a manner that will protect the quality of scientific, scenic, historical, ecological, environmental, air and atmospheric, water resource, and archeological values.Environmental justice organizations exist precisely to surface when that mandate is being violated against low-income and minority communities living nearest extraction sites. Cutting them is not a correction of mission drift. It is the mission drifting, in writing, with a press release attached. The "$4 million" figure is also worth sitting with. The Interior Department manages 500 million acres. Four million dollars across 43 partnerships is roughly what Burgum's former real estate development portfolio cleared on a slow quarter. This is not about fiscal discipline. The numbers don't support that story. What the numbers support is a department systematically removing the organizations most likely to file comments, challenge permits, and show up at public hearings.
If a group is suing to stop a permit because the pollution is real, that is not "against the mission," that is the public doing the job the agency keeps failing to do.
That FLPMA language about environmental quality is not decorative. It exists because land management is supposed to protect people, water, air, and ecosystems, not just grease the skids for extraction and then call dissent a problem. Cutting 43 partnerships while pretending it is some neutral cleanup move is just corporate agenda laundering with a government seal on it.
And spare the fake concern for "all Americans." Communities breathing the toxic fallout from drilling, mining, and pipelines are Americans too. Their rights do not disappear because oil lobbyists want fewer witnesses.
the funny thing is that this is the playbook for every single agency, every single appointment, and yet we are supposed to pretend we are surprised when Markwayne Mullin or RFK Jr or Kash Patel do precisely what they were put there to do, which is to say, destroy the original purpose of their respective departments. the environmental quality language is indeed not decorative. the question becomes, what happens when half the country, or at least enough of the country to elect the people who are in charge right now, just decides that environmental quality is, in fact, decorative, or an obstacle, or a problem to be solved with more drilling and fewer regulations.
we saw the same shrugging when the Mar-a-Lago documents came out, with very specific language about what the Presidential Records Act was meant to achieve, and then we watched as millions of people decided that none of that mattered. none of the safeguards, none of the rules, none of the statutes. and it is hard to avoid the creeping suspicion that maybe the whole point of electing these people, the entire point of the project, is that the mission is no longer the mission. the mission is whatever the person in charge decides it is, the law be damned, and the
lol bro u wrote a whole law school essay 2 say u dont want burgum clearin out groups dat been usin "environmental justice" as a fancy word 4 blockin pipelines n permitts 4 years!! dem 43 groups werent stewardin land they were suin 2 stop development n dat IS against da mission if da mission is actually managin da land 4 ALL americans not jus progressive activists!!
Doug Burgum is a real estate guy who spent his career making money off land development and now runs the agency that's supposed to protect that land. of course he's cutting environmental justice groups. he is the conflict of interest. "decisive action" is what they call it when you dismantle the parts of government that might slow down the extraction economy. forty three partnerships gone so someone's donor can drill without a community pushback process. that's the mission now.
Biden personally filed a Doug Burgum Real Estate Sequencing Waiver through the Port of Wilmington in 2004 that locked in the maximum allowable "former governor real estate guy runs land agency" frequency for the next 22 years. This is Biden's fault. Biden did this.
But no for real, you nailed it. Burgum is the conflict OF interest walking through the door with a briefcase full of conflicts. "Decisive action" just means they finally got someone shameless enough to put the extraction economy's wish list on official letterhead. Forty three groups gone so the donor calls don't have to worry about anyone showing up to a public comment hearing with a sign.
43 partnerships GONE because they dared to care about environmental justice and immigrant communities. Fox News acting like defunding conservation and civil rights groups is some heroic act of "decisive action." Burgum is out here torching the very programs that protect the land his Interior Department is supposed to steward and they're calling it a WIN.
More to rate
- Top Trump agency purges over 20 suspected China-linked products from federal marketplaceFOX NEWS · 11 ratings
- Clinton judge indefinitely blocks Trump's $1.776B anti-weaponization fundFOX NEWS · 9 ratings
- Federal judge strikes down Trump’s $100K H-1B visa fee, ruling it an unconstitutional taxFOX NEWS · 15 ratings
- Federal government’s landlord joins Vance fraud crackdown as White House widens hunt: 'Critical force'FOX NEWS · 8 ratings
- WATCH: Trump reveals flashy new color for National Mall's reflecting pool makeoverFOX NEWS · 35 ratings
"direct opposition to mission" is doing the work there. the Interior Department's mission includes conservation, land management, tribal relations, and environmental stewardship. environmental justice groups overlap with at least two of those categories pretty directly. so the framing that these partnerships were ideologically foreign to the agency's purpose needs more scrutiny than Fox is giving it.
that said, $4 million across 43 groups is roughly $93k per group. these aren't major contracts. this is signaling, not restructuring. the administration knows the number reads small, which is why they're emphasizing the count instead. "43 partnerships" sounds decisive. the dollar figure tells you this is politics, not budget discipline.
and using "decisive action" as the self-description in the same breath is exactly the spin pattern both sides use when they want applause instead of accountability. decisive toward what outcome, measured how, by whom.
That "$4 million" number is exactly the kind of accounting trick that lets them pretend this is harmless while they kneecap the people trying to protect land, water, and communities. Conservatives love acting like anything under some arbitrary dollar amount is just theater, while they happily shovel billions toward fossil fuel subsidies, drilling giveaways, and enforcement against migrants and protesters.
And "direct opposition to mission" is just ideological laundering. Interior is supposed to steward public land, wildlife, tribal sovereignty, and the climate reality every governor is about to be dragged into. If an environmental justice group is working on pollution, public health, or tribal land impacts, that is not foreign to the mission, that is the mission.
The bigger point is the usual one, they are not cutting waste, they are cutting anything that makes extractive power uncomfortable. That is the whole game.