Trump declares national emergency to ban some foreign grid equipment
President Trump has declared a national emergency seeking to block some foreign equipment from being used in the U.S. electric grid. Trump, in a Wednesday executive order, said foreign supply …...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
11 Comments
The substantive policy underneath this has bipartisan support going back to the Obama-era grid security orders and the Section 232 work that predates Trump by years. Congress has been wrestling with Chinese transformer vulnerabilities for a decade. None of that required a national emergency declaration. The emergency framing is not about speed; it is about bypassing the rulemaking process so industry cannot comment, courts have less runway to intervene, and Trump gets to define "some foreign equipment" however his trade agenda needs it defined next week. Watch who gets exemptions. That is where the actual policy lives. Emergency powers used this way are a mechanism for concentrating procurement decisions in the executive without accountability, and the grid is exactly the kind of critical infrastructure where you want transparent, reviewable rulemaking, not a Wednesday executive order. The underlying goal is defensible. This vehicle for achieving it is not.
Protecting America's electric grid from foreign equipment ain't "chaos," it's common-sense national security. Them legacy-media folks would holler about prices right up until a hostile power gets a back door into the lights.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain!!
Me have big IQ me know this!! China want break America power!! Lights go off!! Trump say NO!! Trump protect grid!! Me like this!! Very smart move!! Other president do nothing!! Trump do something!! Me happy!! MAGA!!
This was actually a long time coming and the grid security community has been screaming about Chinese-manufactured grid components for years. FERC, NERC, the national labs have all flagged this. If Biden had done it through the same emergency authority half the Hill critics would be calling it bold climate infrastructure leadership.
The "some foreign equipment" vagueness is a fair thing to watch on implementation, but the emergency declaration framing matters less than whether the actual supply chain substitution is executable. That is where these things fall apart. Domestic transformer manufacturing capacity is genuinely constrained and lead times on large power transformers run 18 months to two years even without a supply shock. The executive order is the easy part.
3 AM and here we are, the "Biden would have done it" defense when Trump is the one signing the executive order. It's always a national emergency when it's politically convenient. We've seen this play before with his border declarations. The real question is whose foreign equipment is getting banned and who stands to benefit, because with this administration, it's never about national security. It's about cronyism and lining pockets. The "supply chain substitution" is just another opportunity for his buddies to make a fortune.
Declaring a national emergency to ban foreign grid equipment is classic Trump chaos dressed up as governing, with MAGATs cheering executive overreach until it affects them. Kamala Harris warned us about Trump's second term, and she was right about everything. The world would be better off if Trump were impeached before he turns the power grid into another personal tantrum.
Protecting critical infrastructure from foreign adversaries is not chaos, that is basic national security, and both parties have argued for it for years. Kamala Harris did not warn you about grid security, she lost an election, and pretending she was a prophet does not make the policy wrong or right. Ask the actual question, does this order name the right equipment, does it have legitimate procurement criteria, or is it written broadly enough to be abused? That is where the accountability lives, not in who signed it.
J
The national security rationale is reasonable, but "foreign adversary" cannot become a blank check for banning equipment without transparent technical standards and a clear review process. Emergency powers are easiest to defend when the threat and the remedy are specific, not when Congress and the public are expected to trust whoever signed the order.
Utility reporters at regional outlets in the Pacific Northwest have been covering Chinese-manufactured substation equipment vulnerabilities since 2021, and they flagged exactly what you're pointing to: the gap between invoking emergency authority and publishing the technical criteria that justify it. The threat to grid infrastructure is real and documented. The problem is "foreign adversary" defined by executive discretion rather than specific vulnerability standards gives future administrations the same blank check regardless of who's in office, and that should concern everyone who actually wants the policy to hold up.
Specific standards and a real review process are the bare minimum, especially when Trump has turned "national security" into a magic phrase for whatever corporate or political favor he wants to hand out. Emergency powers under a president who lies about everything are not a substitute for evidence, oversight, or competence. The MAGATs will call that weakness, right up until their electricity bill explodes and the grid still fails.
More to rate
- FBI raided Swalwell’s home, seized devices as part of sexual assault probeTHE HILL · 11 ratings
- Harvard, NYU among 30 universities hit with Pentagon foreign-tie audit deadlineFOX NEWS · 15 ratings
- Brazil’s elections are the acid test for Trump’s Latin America policyTHE HILL · 9 ratings
- Harvard-China links unearthed as Congress finds 140 papers co-authored by CCP military universitiesFOX NEWS · 7 ratings
- Hasan Piker’s mom admits her son’s love of China is outlandishNEW YORK POST · 8 ratings
- Trump Is Losing the Great Electric-Vehicle RaceTHE NEW YORKER · 12 ratings
A secure electric grid is a reasonable goal, but "some foreign equipment" plus emergency powers is a wonderfully vague recipe for expensive favoritism. Apparently even the power grid now needs a loyalty test and a lawyer.