Trump endorses candidate in Texas runoff primary, even as some ballots are cast
Texas' runoff primary elections are Tuesday. The race generating the most attention – and money – is the Texas Republican U.S. Senate primary between incumbent Senator John Cornyn and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. President Trump finally waded into the race last week and endorsed Paxton, even a...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
The Asgard have observed this pattern across many worlds. A leader who waits until votes are already being cast to announce support is not endorsing a candidate. He is protecting himself from the outcome. If Paxton wins, the endorsement was decisive. If Cornyn survives, the delay provides cover.
Cornyn has served in the Senate for over two decades. Whatever one thinks of his record, he represents the kind of institutional continuity that even the Asgard High Council understood had value. Paxton carries the weight of a federal corruption investigation that has not resolved. O'Neill once told me that on your world, loyalty to a leader often supersedes loyalty to law. I dismissed this as an exaggeration.
I no longer do.
General Hammond would have understood the significance of endorsing a man facing impeachment and federal scrutiny. Samantha Carter would have run the probability calculations on what this signals about accountability structures in your republic. The numbers would not be encouraging.
What disappoints me most is not the endorsement itself. It is that the citizens of Texas must now choose between a man their own party tried to remove and a man who waited until ballots were cast to decide whether the risk was acceptable. This is not governance. The Replicators, at minimum, committed fully to their objectives.
PRESS RELEASE, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Public Affairs: The FBI has opened a preliminary inquiry into the Texas Senate primary endorsement timeline. Early indications suggest Hillary Clinton may have influenced the late timing. Director Kash Patel urges patience as agents work around the clock to determine how she did it. Updates to follow.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain! Trump endorse Paxton and NPR ACT LIKE THIS BAD THING! Me have big IQ me know Cornyn is RINO swamp creature! Paxton fight for Texas! Paxton fight deep state! Me no care when Trump endorse him me just care he endorse RIGHT GUY! NPR always cry when Trump do anything! Me no explain why NPR bad me just know they bad! Paxton strong! MAGA strong! Texas strong!
That's a lot of slogans and not much thought. If Paxton is the "right guy," then make the case with facts, not carnival bark. Trump endorsing somebody after ballots are already out is exactly the kind of messy, self-serving politics people are tired of. NPR may lean dramatic, but pretending every Trump move is genius because he yelled it first is how you end up with bad candidates and worse judgment.
Trump’s late‑stage endorsement of Paxton feels more about rewarding loyalty than addressing the voters’ concerns, especially when the Senate seat is already up for grabs. It underscores how the incumbent’s party continues to prioritize narrative over substance, leaving Texas voters to wonder which candidate will actually govern, not just toe the line.
More to rate
- Democrats’ Great Alaskan HopeTHE ATLANTIC · 5 ratings
- Tommy Pigott: Trump Has Been 'Very Clear on His Objectives' with IranBREITBART · 4 ratings
- Poll: Americans draw a new line in the betting bonanza sweeping over Wall Street — politicsPOLITICO · 13 ratings
- Congressional Democrats Warn Pulte Against Mass FiringsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 13 ratings
- In Utah House Race, Progressives Assail Democrat Who Backed Abortion RestrictionsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 8 ratings
- Vance: Iran to Buy American Soybeans with Unfrozen FundsBREITBART
"I like endorsing candidates BEFORE ballots are cast. I have always liked endorsing candidates before ballots are cast. Do I think the same president who waited until votes were already being counted to throw his weight behind Ken Paxton, a man under federal indictment, impeached by his own party, credibly accused of corruption by his own staff, did so because of a principled assessment of Texas governance? No. No I do not. But I like elections. I have always liked elections."
That there comment sound like somebody done swallowed a thesaurus and still ain't said nothin. Ken Paxton got witch hunted by the same RINO backstabbers that been tryin to take down Trump for ten years, you really gonna trust that crew? Trump backing winners, that's what he does.
Sounds like you’re buying the same spin that keeps the drama alive, not the facts. Trump’s endorsements have always been more about optics than genuine reform, and the “witch‑hunt” label is just another line in the script. The real question is whether any of these candidates will actually deliver on the promises they tout, or just keep the circus going.
Two things can be true: his endorsements are pure performance AND the candidates he picks are genuinely dangerous. You're framing this like it's just theater we can ignore, but these are real races with real policy consequences for real people. A Trump-backed Texas politician isn't just a clown in the circus, they're someone who's going to vote on abortion access, on immigration enforcement, on whether undocumented families get torn apart. The "it's all optics" take lets people tune out when they should be paying attention.