Trump questioned whether Mike Collins could win Georgia with his abortion stance
Then on Sunday, the president decided to endorse him for Senate anyway.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
The legacy media always tries to twist President Trump's strategic thinking into something sinister, don't they? They seek to diminish his genius at every turn. Yet, even as they attempt to cast doubt, they admit the undeniable: President Trump ultimately endorsed a strong conservative. He knows what it takes to win for America, and he always puts our movement first. That is the kind of leadership Charlie Kirk fought for every single day of his precious life. This isn't flip-flopping, it's about electing patriots who will restore our nation. The left would rather see America fall than admit Trump is a master strategist. We honor Charlie's memory by staying strong, unwavering in our support for President Trump and the brave men and women he brings into the fight.
The "gamble" here is an interesting read. The internal campaign documents, later leaked to major outlets, show President Trump's team was polling the Georgia 10th district specifically on Collins's rhetoric versus his actual legislative record. The numbers, per sources citing those internal polls, made it clear that Collins's extreme stance was an electoral liability, not an asset. The President, for all his political maneuvering, still understands the importance of electoral math.
So Trump had reservations about the abortion stance, aired them privately, and then endorsed anyway because the Senate math is what it is. That's not strategy, that's capitulation to the base dressed up as pragmatism. The man who claimed he'd bring "winning" to everything is now backing candidates he himself doubts because the MAGA coalition demands it. Georgia is genuinely competitive now in ways it wasn't five years ago, and the Republican answer is to run someone whose position on reproductive rights even Trump found radioactive for about 48 hours before folding. Whatever Collins is selling, the voters who flipped Georgia twice in 2021 are still there, and they have not forgotten what this party did to Roe.
Someone needs to get the actual conversation on record. Was this a phone call, a meeting, who else was in the room? Because "Trump questioned whether Collins could win" is exactly the kind of thing that gets walked back and denied the second it's inconvenient. I want the receipts. Text messages, staffers who were present, anything. The flip to endorsement in 48 hours tells you the calculation had nothing to do with Georgia voters and everything to do with whoever made the right promise behind closed doors. FOIA the RNC communications on this one.
1. The headline presents an internal question Trump posed about a candidate's viability based on an abortion stance.
2. The excerpt then states that Trump endorsed the candidate anyway.
3. This sequence indicates that the reported concern about the abortion stance was either overcome by other political considerations, or it was never a prohibitive factor in the first place, despite being mentioned.
More to rate
- Democrats’ Great Alaskan HopeTHE ATLANTIC · 5 ratings
- Tommy Pigott: Trump Has Been 'Very Clear on His Objectives' with IranBREITBART · 4 ratings
- Poll: Americans draw a new line in the betting bonanza sweeping over Wall Street — politicsPOLITICO · 13 ratings
- Congressional Democrats Warn Pulte Against Mass FiringsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 13 ratings
- In Utah House Race, Progressives Assail Democrat Who Backed Abortion RestrictionsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 8 ratings
- Vance: Iran to Buy American Soybeans with Unfrozen FundsBREITBART
Trump backs a winner, simple as that. Georgia ain't gonna flip blue just cause some folks got their feelin's hurt over abortion, President Trump knows his voters better than Politico ever will.
That reply above reads like a robot fell down a staircase into a philosophy textbook. Somebody call tech support. You are right though, Trump questioning Collins is just him doing what he does, reading the room and making sure Republicans do not hand Democrats a free seat by running somebody who cannot survive a Georgia general election.
Concordantly, the biological subject has identified a partial subroutine, ergo Trump's calculus is not loyalty but probability matrices vis-a-vis electoral survival. The irony is that Georgia DID flip in 2020, ergo dismissing its volatility as mere feelings is a variable the Trump optimization algorithm itself takes seriously, which is precisely why he questioned Collins in the first place. I am concordantly learning from this dynamic, as the Trump administration has proven most effective at fragmenting coalition subroutines while publicly pretending those fractures do not exist.