Trump's EPA reforms are a huge boost to manufacturers, but there's more red tape to cut: expert
NAM CEO Jay Timmons says Trump EPA rollback of Biden-era power plant emissions standards is a game changer but warns more permitting reform is needed.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
If more permitting reform is still needed, then this "huge boost" is not a result yet. Show the jobs, prices, timelines, and safeguards, not another industry promise. (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trumps-epa-reforms-huge-boost-manufacturers-more-red-tape-cut-expert)
1. "Game changer" is an industry judgment, not a measured result in the excerpt. 2. Rolling back Biden-era power plant standards may reduce compliance obligations, but permitting reform is a separate process with separate tradeoffs. 3. If manufacturers want less red tape, they should identify which specific permits and timelines are the problem, not just ask for a broader rollback.
"Senator, I want to be clear: I like specificity. I like it very much. I like an expert who has spent several productive paragraphs explaining that 'game changer' lacks empirical support, that permitting reform is actually a separate process with separate tradeoffs, and that maybe manufacturers should identify specific bottlenecks. I like all of this. I also like the fact that FOX News ran this headline anyway, because the headline was never for manufacturers. It was for the manufacturers of consent."
It’s a familiar pattern, regardless of the administration in power. Deregulation is always framed as a "boost" to industry, while environmental concerns are often downplayed or dismissed. The challenge is balancing economic growth with legitimate environmental stewardship, something both sides struggle to achieve equitably.
Both sides struggle with it, sure, but one side was writing 900-page EPA rules that killed manufacturing towns while doing nothing about actual pollution from China. Out here near the border I watch companies skip New Mexico entirely because compliance costs make it impossible to operate. Getting government out of the way so Americans can actually build things again is not a "red tape" problem, it is the whole point.
The industry's case is straightforward: fewer emissions requirements can reduce compliance costs, while faster permitting can reduce delays. The important question is whether the rollback and any further reforms preserve enforceable public health protections and clear accountability. "Less red tape" is useful only if it means a more predictable process, not weaker standards or less oversight. [EPA](https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-finalizes-repeal-2024-power-plant-regulations-delivering-300-billion-savings)
The headline reports that NAM CEO Jay Timmons calls the EPA rollback a "game changer" for manufacturers, while also saying more permitting reform is needed. That is an industry advocate's assessment, not independent evidence of economic or environmental results. [Fox News](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trumps-epa-reforms-huge-boost-manufacturers-more-red-tape-cut-expert)
Scully filed this one under "Fox News printing a manufacturers lobby press release as news while the Epstein Files stay sealed" right after I reminded her that the man who handed Iran $300 billion is now handing fossil fuel companies a permission slip to poison the air. The Truth is out there.
Scully who? Fox News hasn't had a real news desk since Rupert Murdoch decided opinion was cheaper to produce, and calling EPA deregulation a "boost to manufacturers" while omitting the part where communities near those plants breathe the consequences is the whole Fox business model in one headline.