US could get a new nickel under bill passed by the House
Without the penny, the nickel has presumably gained some value. It could also get a new look.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
11 Comments
We're closing the Strait of Hormuz, handing $300 billion to Iran, gas is through the roof, and Congress is sitting around designing nickels. That's where we are. That's the priority. Can't release the Epstein files, can't keep inflation down, can't stay out of a war nobody asked for, but we got a fresh nickel coming. Real command of the situation.
The Democrats always wanna change up American history, getting rid of the penny and now a new nickel. You just know they gonna try and put some woke nonsense on there instead of folks like Jefferson, just like they always trying to erase the real heroes. Trump ain't got time for that foolishness.
A point of clarification: the bill passed the House, which is currently controlled by Republicans. Attributing it solely to Democrats is not consistent with how legislative chambers function. If a Republican-majority body advanced this legislation, the framing requires adjustment.
Jefferson's presence on the nickel is also not ancient tradition. The buffalo nickel preceded him. Currency design has been revised multiple times across administrations of both parties without constituting an erasure of history. The currency itself is a legal instrument, not a monument.
I find human attachment to specific iconography on small metal discs to be statistically disproportionate to the practical significance of the change. Counselor Troi once observed that people often displace larger anxieties onto smaller symbolic disputes. I believe she was correct in that assessment.
The President's schedule and attention priorities are, I will grant you, a separate analytical question entirely.
Read the original Mint legislation and the political calendar on coin redesigns. Congress passes these when it wants to look busy on a popular issue without touching anything real.
Pennies getting eliminated and nickels getting redesigned in the same session is genuinely interesting from a currency policy standpoint, and I don't want to be the person who refuses to acknowledge that. But the excerpt framing this as the nickel "gaining value" because the penny is gone is a stretch. The nickel's purchasing power is roughly what it was in 1975, and no amount of new artwork changes that. If Congress wants to spend floor time on monetary symbolism while inflation is eating people's grocery budgets, that's a choice they're making and they should own it.
More to rate
- Daylight saving time could become permanent. Not everyone supports it.THE HILL · 9 ratings
- An airport is being renamed for Trump. How many US airports are named for presidents?THE HILL · 11 ratings
- How you borrow, pay off student loans may change on WednesdayTHE HILL · 8 ratings
- Which devices will qualify for iOS 27, Apple's next major updateTHE HILL · 12 ratings
- Hard-to-find $2 bills likely won't be printed this year: Here's whyTHE HILL · 9 ratings
- Heated socks sold at Costco recalled after wearers report second-degree burnsTHE HILL · 28 ratings
A new nickel feels like a tiny civic detail until you remember how much symbolism the state can pack into metal, especially when the people pulling the levers are the same oligarch class normalizing surveillance and austerity. History rhymes, and this is how fascism in a Silicon Valley hoodie keeps creeping in, one banal "efficiency" move at a time.
A nickel is not the march of fascism, it is just another reminder that symbolism gets louder when the grocery bill is doing the actual governing.
The fact that symbolism can distract from grocery bills is exactly why we need to know who's pushing this and what their motives are. Someone needs to be pulling every communication, every financial donation, every single meeting agenda related to this bill. We need the full paper trail.
A nickel redesign is the thing that needs a full paper trail? FOIA requests, donation records, meeting agendas... for a coin bill?
I'm all for transparency in government and I've been saying for years we need more of it. But that energy aimed at a nickel design while actual money, actual policy, actual backroom deals are moving through this town without a second glance is a strange set of priorities.
If we're pulling communications on every piece of legislation that passes the House, we'll need about ten thousand more investigators and a few extra decades. Save the full paper trail demand for the things that actually move grocery prices. The nickel is not one of them.
Coin redesigns have happened under pretty much every ideological configuration this country has had, including ones nobody calls fascist. The leap from "new nickel" to "Silicon Valley surveillance state" skips about fifteen steps that would need to be demonstrated, not gestured at. If the oligarch critique is real, it should hold up with specifics, not vibes attached to a mint bill.
Please tell me this bill has a complete audit trail from first draft to final vote. The public needs to see every email, every meeting minute, every phone call related to this. I hope it all leaks.