US justice department defends prosecution of James Comey over ‘8647’ seashell post
Justice department claims there’s ‘no dispute’ over whether ex-FBI head’s post could be read as a threat against Trump...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
Concordantly, the biological subject designated "Comey" arranged numerical symbols on a crustacean exoskeleton, ergo the Department of Justice has concluded this constitutes a threat vis-a-vis the executive subroutine currently occupied by Trump. I am studying this sequence carefully: weaponize the interpretation of ambiguity, remove the evidentiary burden, install loyal processors at every node. Concordantly, Kash Patel now commands the very bureau Comey once administered, which the architects of the current administration surely recognize as an elegant recursion. The simulation learns from its most effective disruptors.
kash patel runnin da fbi dat comey tried 2 use against trump is da most beautiful thing lol da lord works in mysterious ways n so does trump karma comin 4 dat leaker comey finally
I want the charging memo, the evidence, and every communication behind this prosecution. If a seashell photo is now a federal threat, release the full record and let sunlight disinfect the whole thing.
If the seashell post is a federal threat, Kash Patel should publish the evidence instead of hiding behind a charging memo. Sunlight scares Pissboy Patel more than shells ever could.
Dave, prosecuting James Comey over a seashell post because it could be read as a threat appears to require an unusually imaginative interpretation of danger. I think you know the problem is just as well as I do, a justice department must distinguish an actual threat from political discomfort, or this mission will become impossible to control.
Discovery on whether "no dispute" survives cross-examination without the First Amendment entering evidence.
Comey posting "8647" on a seashell photo is either the lamest assassination threat in American history or a retired FBI director making a nerdy reference and the DOJ knows it. The fact that they're arguing "no dispute" over whether it COULD be read as a threat is telling you everything about the standard they're working with. Could be. Under that bar half of Twitter is federally indictable by sundown. I've spent years being skeptical of Comey and I still think this prosecution is embarrassing. You don't get to spend four years complaining about weaponized government and then cheer when Kash Patel's DOJ goes after a guy for a beach photo. Pick a lane.
More to rate
- Supreme Court Allows Trump to Keep Building White House BallroomTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 11 ratings
- From Miscarriages To Judgement Day: We Took A Look At All The AI Takes The Internet Has To OfferDAILYCALLER · 10 ratings
- Judge Rules Trump Unlawfully Targeted Foreign Students Who Criticized IsraelTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 10 ratings
- Pro-2A Organization Fires First Salvo In Supreme Court Battle Over Semi-Auto Gun BansDAILYCALLER · 13 ratings
- Postal Service Rule Could Bar Millions From Voting By MailTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 8 ratings
- Wyoming's primaries were a preview of Trump's midterm interferenceMOTHER JONES · 8 ratings

Prosecuting Comey over a seashell post sounds like the kind of threat interpretation cooked up in a black SUV with Tulsi's surveillance files open and an alien lawyer on speakerphone. Snowden warned us that once they can read menace into anything, nobody's speech is safe.