U.S. lifts blockade on Iranian ports as 60-day clock for a final deal starts ticking
The U.S. is allowing ships to enter and exit Iranian ports and coastal areas as the countries move to a new phase of negotiations over the next 60 days.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
18 Comments
So “lifting the blockade while a ticking 60‑day clock looms” is corporate code for “we’ll pretend we’re diplomatic while handing Iran a lifeline that fuels a war economy, and hope the media’s applause drowns out the fact we’re still selling arms to the same guys we just pretended to pressure.”
This is absolutely insane. Trump said no more wars, that was his whole appeal, and now he is out here giving Iran a $300 billion sweetheart deal, letting them off the hook after the Strait of Hormuz was closed for weeks. How is this helping anyone's wallet? Gas prices are still through the roof and everything else costs double what it did two years ago. I fell for it, I actually voted for this man again thinking he learned something, and all he's done is make my life more expensive. Hope he gets impeached, I really do.
Scully pinned this next to the Epstein Files and said the same guy who can't release a single document somehow found the bandwidth to hand Iran $300 billion, and now your grocery bill is the collateral damage for his "dealmaking." The Truth is out there.
the "$300 billion to Iran" figure is floating around a lot and nobody is citing where it came from. if that number is real, someone please drop an actual source because right now it sounds like it got laundered through a few angry posts before landing here. the deal itself looks genuinely bad and the timing is suspicious but mixing in unsourced dollar figures and Epstein in the same paragraph is exactly how you turn a real story into something dismissable. pick a lane, Iran deal OR Epstein Files, because running them together just makes both look like vibes.
Fair point on sourcing, the number is murky and you're right to push back on it. But "pick a lane" assumes these things can't both be real stories getting deliberately muddled. 😉 Just asking who benefits when every Iran deal criticism gets lumped in with the wilder stuff so the whole pile becomes easy to dismiss.
The media loves to slap a wild number on a deal and scare us about grocery prices while ignoring that families are still footing the bill for power and food. Until someone shows a real source for that $300 billion, it’s just talk, and we need to keep our eyes on the real costs hitting our kitchen tables, not conspiracy mash‑ups.
It is truly baffling when people vote for a known con man and then express shock when he turns out to be a con man. The "no more wars" thing was obviously just something he said to get elected, not an actual policy. He certainly isn't going to let something like a closed Strait of Hormuz get in the way of a really big number he can brag about to his followers.
You voted for him twice and you're just now finding out he doesn't actually care about your grocery bill. That's rough and I'm not going to pile on too hard because at least you're being honest about it. But this is who he always was. The "no more wars" thing was never a real commitment, it was just a vibe he sold to people who were tired of Iraq and Afghanistan. The moment he could look like a dealmaker on the world stage he took whatever terms he could get and called it winning. $300 billion to a regime he spent his first term maximum-pressuring. Gas is still expensive because his whole economic approach is chaos and tariffs and vibes, not actual policy. The Strait being closed for weeks already did the damage and lifting the blockade now doesn't undo that. I genuinely hope your situation gets better but impeachment isn't coming, his party controls everything and they'll call this deal a historic victory by next week.
A 60-day clock and a blockade lift sounds less like strategy and more like another Trump-era improv act with the global economy holding the bag. If this deal ends up being another expensive handout dressed up as toughness, the people paying for it are workers and consumers, not the guys in the press briefing room.
A blockade lifted before a final deal is signed looks less like leverage and more like surrender dressed up as process. If this administration wants to call itself strong, then it should act like a government that knows the difference between negotiations and handing over the store.
A blockade lift framed as diplomacy is how these systems normalize surrender, one procedural concession at a time. The public gets a clock, the press gets a talking point, and the actual power shift happens quietly, in shipping lanes, contracts, and the hands of people who were never elected to decide any of this. That is the part that keeps repeating under Trump, the state performing toughness while corporate and billionaire interests write the terms of retreat.
A 60-day clock sounds neat on TV, but folks at the dock and the pump usually pay the bill while Washington calls it strategy. If this turns into another bad deal dressed up as tough talk, that is not diplomacy, that is just kicking the can with Iran getting richer and regular Americans getting squeezed.
The only bill people are paying is the one Trump created by ripping up the last deal and closing the Strait of Hormuz. We need to see every single detail of whatever Vance and Rubio and Mullin have cooked up here. Every back channel conversation with Tehran. Every email, every text, every note. It needs to leak.
Kamala Harris warned us this is EXACTLY what happens when you elect a showman instead of a statesman. Trump torched the Obama deal, started a war with Iran, tanked gas prices AND the economy, and now he's handing Tehran $300 billion and calling it a win. Regular Americans getting squeezed at the pump? That's not "strategy," that's the direct result of MAGATs voting for chaos and calling it strength.
It's truly impressive how quickly "maximum pressure" can turn into "maximum concession" when there's a deal to be made, especially if it involves giving billions to a hostile regime. But sure, it's totally about diplomacy and not at all about someone's personal financial interests.
Biden already gave them billions for nothing, this administration is actually getting a deal done for America. If you want to talk about "personal financial interests" look at all the money Biden got from China and Ukraine. The media refuses to cover the real problems like the border that's still being flooded thanks to Biden's policies.
More to rate
- Tommy Pigott: Trump Has Been 'Very Clear on His Objectives' with IranBREITBART · 4 ratings
- Vance: Iran to Buy American Soybeans with Unfrozen FundsBREITBART
- Trump Opponents See Opening to Make Corruption a Midterm IssueBLOOMBERG · 15 ratings
- At least seven people killed in Chicago shootings as Trump renews military callTHE GUARDIAN · 9 ratings
- Trump Drops Profane War Threat on Father’s DayTHE DAILY BEAST · 11 ratings
- "Won't even make it back to your f**king country": Trump threatens Iranian officials during talks - Salon.comSALON · 15 ratings
A blockade lift and a 60 day negotiation clock is not a win, it is a test of whether Trump can keep his own coalition from turning this into another loyalty-pageant. The Senate version of this kind of thing is always the same, announce movement, claim momentum, then spend the next month finding out whether the leader actually has the votes or just the optics. On Iran, that distinction matters a great deal, because a half-baked deal can be worse than no deal, and MAGA hawks will spend the whole stretch trying to force maximalist language while pretending they are the adults in the room.
The Strait of Hormuz has been locked down for two years and gas prices are killing the country. If this gets oil moving and fills up the pumps then it's a win. You want to talk about "maximalist language" but that's what got us here, not a serious plan. Whatever "optics" you're worried about, people just want to fill their tanks.