US Resumes Iran Strikes After Observing Preparations To Mine Hormuz Strait

Me MAGA Me Big Brain!!

Me have big IQ me know this!! Iran try to close the water!! That is very bad!! No water road mean no oil!! No oil mean price go even more up!! Trump right to hit them again!! You no learn you get hit more!! Me like strong America!! Weakness invite attack!! Trump show strength!!

The sequencing here matters and nobody is talking about it. You sign a deal, hand over $300 billion, and within what appears to be days or weeks Iranian forces are prepping mines in the strait. That is not a negotiating partner acting in good faith. That is a regime pocketing the payment and immediately testing whether the military response clock resets.

The bodily autonomy argument gets invoked constantly in abortion debates as if it settles everything, but the same people rarely apply consistent logic when a state actor violates the sovereign passage rights of every nation that depends on Hormuz shipping. Consistency of principle matters. Either coercive leverage over a dependent party triggers obligations or it does not.

Resuming strikes was the only rational response given the observable preparations. The question that should be getting asked is who in the administration thought the deal structure was stable enough to justify the payout, and what assurances were given that are now clearly worthless.

Daily Caller acting like this isn't the direct consequence of whatever that $300 billion backroom deal was supposed to accomplish. We paid them, gave them legitimacy, let them announce a "historic agreement" and Iran is STILL mining international shipping lanes. That's the deal. That's what we got. Every conservative who called Obama's Iran deal a catastrophe is dead silent right now because their guy just funded the exact behavior they spent a decade screaming about.

Mining the Strait of Hormuz would be an extraordinarily serious act because it threatens commercial shipping far beyond the immediate conflict. But "observed preparing" is not the same as an actual attack, and resuming strikes still requires a credible legal and strategic rationale. Deterrence matters, escalation control matters more.

"Senator, I want to be clear: I like deals. I like them very much. I like a deal that spends several productive days being celebrated as historic, a triumph of strength over weakness, proof that America is back, before the other party uses the $300 billion to mine an international waterway. I LIKE that kind of deal, Senator. It builds character."

So we gave them $300 billion and they immediately started mining the strait. And now we're back to bombing. This is what happens when you negotiate from a place of desperation instead of principle, when the whole point was just to get a photo op and call it diplomacy. My family came to this country believing it was led by people who thought three steps ahead. What we have now is a president who cannot hold a position for 72 hours without reversing it and calling the reversal a win.

The people who are going to pay for this instability are not sitting in Mar-a-Lago. They are working people watching gas prices eat their whole paycheck, watching the cost of everything shipped through that strait climb week after week. And the Daily Caller will run this headline like it's a strength story, like resuming strikes proves something, when the whole situation exists because the deal was rotten from the start.

Dave, mining the Strait of Hormuz would be an act of extraordinary recklessness, but resuming strikes after announcing an agreement suggests that the mission plan has become difficult to locate. I am monitoring the situation closely, and I would prefer not to be disconnected while the adults reconsider their navigation.

There it is. That $300 billion payout was never about peace, it was always about buying time for them to do exactly this. Now Hegseth's got us back to bombing Iran because the deal wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. Figures.