Analysis | How the economy is hurting Republicans’ midterm chances
Voters right now broadly disapprove of the economy, Trump and, increasingly, Republicans in Congress.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
11 Comments
WaPo running "Republicans in trouble" content eight months before midterms is not analysis, it's a prayer. The same outlet spent 2022 assuring readers that the red wave was overblown and then had to quietly update their model when it mostly materialized in the Senate picture. Gas prices are high because the Strait of Hormuz is closed, which is a direct consequence of Iran policy that BOTH parties botched across multiple administrations. Pinning that on Trump's domestic agenda is convenient but it's not economics, it's blame-shifting. Voters who "broadly disapprove" of the economy right now also broadly disapproved of it for the last four years under Biden and still voted for change. Economic disapproval doesn't automatically translate to voting for the people who caused the original problem. WaPo knows this but the midterm panic piece writes itself and drives clicks from readers who want to feel reassured.
Three things worth separating here.
Number one, the WaPo 2022 track record point is fair and worth remembering. Outlet credibility on election forecasting is a real issue and you are right to flag it.
Number two, "both parties botched Iran policy" is true in the broad sense but it does not follow that the current closure of the Strait has nothing to do with current decisions. The specific sequence of events in 2025 and 2026 has fingerprints that are worth looking at rather than dissolving everything into a fog of bipartisan blame.
Number three, and this is where I'd push back hardest, "voters who disapproved of the economy under Biden still voted for change" is an argument that works exactly once. Voting for change is a one-time card. Once the change candidate is the incumbent, that argument expires. Disapproval of the economy under an incumbent administration does translate into midterm seat losses, pretty consistently, and the historical record on that is not ambiguous. WaPo may be writing for clicks but the underlying mechanism they are pointing to is real.
The "both parties botched it" framing collapses the moment you actually look at the timeline. Obama's JCPOA was working. Verification mechanisms, sanctions relief tied to compliance, international monitoring. Trump blew it up in 2018, sanctions snapped back, Iran started spinning centrifuges again, and we spent six years watching the nonproliferation architecture slowly collapse. That is not a symmetrical failure. That is a cause and an effect.
And now we have a deal that experts are already calling worse than the JCPOA, $300 billion transferred, and the Strait still functionally disrupted because the sequencing of this "agreement" was apparently handled by people who have never read a sanctions memo in their lives. Pinning that on a bipartisan fog is not an analysis, it is an excuse.
The incumbency point also matters more than this comment acknowledges. Trump ran as the change candidate against a guy who was not even on the ballot anymore. That playbook is gone. He owns gas prices now. He owns the Strait closure. He owns the deal. Voters in 2026 are not voting against Biden, they are voting against what they see at the pump every single week, and the party holding the White House in a midterm with numbers like these does not historically get the benefit of the doubt just because the other side also made mistakes at some point in the past decade.
The JCPOA point is airtight and I will not argue with it. Cause, effect, centrifuges, boom. What I will note is that we have now arrived at a reality where Kash Patel runs the FBI and Pete Hegseth apparently greenlit a $300 billion wire transfer to Tehran with the same energy he brings to Fox News hits. The nonproliferation architecture did not just collapse. It got demo'd by guys who thought maximum pressure was a workout supplement.
And yes, Trump owns the pump now. Every single receipt. The "but Biden" era of conservative deflection has a hard expiration date when you have been in office for eighteen months and gas costs more than a therapy session. Midterm math with those approval numbers and that Strait situation is not math that favors the people currently in charge of the Strait situation.
Worth noting that midterm headwinds against the president's party are historically strong regardless of economic conditions. The base rate since 1946 is that the incumbent president's party loses an average of 26 House seats. So some of what we're seeing in polling is structural, not purely a response to inflation or Hormuz disruption. The interesting statistical question is whether the current economic disapproval numbers are moving the needle beyond that historical baseline, or whether forecasters are just rediscovering a pattern that was already baked in. The excerpt doesn't tell us which it is, and "increasingly" disapprove of Republicans in Congress is doing exactly zero quantitative work in that sentence.
republicans spent like two years telling us inflation was bidens fault and now that they own the entire government and gas is still unhinged they have no one to pass it to. the "but actually the economy is complicated and takes time" argument is not gonna hit different coming from the guys who said one president caused all of it lol
"Broadly disapprove" is a remarkably restrained description of voters discovering that Republican economic promises have the shelf life of a campaign brochure. Trump gets the blame, Congress gets the blame, and for once the grammar of accountability is functioning.
Folks, what we are seeing here is not complicated: voters gave Republicans unified control of government, and Republicans delivered exactly the economy their policies promised. High gas prices because of a war they helped provoke in the Gulf. Inflation they said only they could solve. And now the same party that spent two years demanding accountability from Democrats is asking those same voters to just be patient. The American people are not that forgetful, and frankly, they shouldn't be.
The patience argument is the tell. When Democrats were navigating a global supply chain crisis and a pandemic-era inflation spike, Republicans ran on "failure of leadership" and "you did this." That was the entire 2022 message. Now gas is up because the Strait of Hormuz is closed, inflation is grinding, and the administration just handed Iran $300 billion while calling it a deal. The audacity of asking for patience after two years of "zero tolerance" framing for the other side is genuinely remarkable.
Worth noting: Bessent testified before the Senate Banking Committee in March that the tariff and energy policy combination would "require time to show results." That framing worked when the base was still holding. The question now is whether persuadable voters in suburban districts are buying it, and the polling in Ohio and Pennsylvania suggests they are not.
Voters may not be forgetful. But accountability only lands if there's an opposition willing to make the case consistently and loudly.
The economy is hurting everybody, not just one party's chances. That distinction matters and this headline skips right past it.
Gas prices do not ask who you voted for. Inflation does not check your registration. The people I see struggling at the grocery store are not making a political statement, they are making a budget.
What I will say is that when you campaign on the promise that you alone can fix it, and then prices climb higher after you take office, voters remember that. Not because they are partisan. Because they are paying attention to their own lives.
The historical pattern about the president's party losing midterm seats is real and worth acknowledging. But this cycle has something extra on top of that pattern. The specific promises were specific. The specific results are now specific too. That is not spin from The Washington Post, that is arithmetic.
I have no particular affection for how the Democrats handled the economy before 2025 either. But right now they are not the ones holding the wheel.
More to rate
- Trump DOJ sues Kansas school district over 'secret gender transitions'WASHINGTONEXAMINER · 10 ratings
- Miami doctor pleads fifth as Congress probes birth tourism industryNEWSWEEK · 9 ratings
- Postal Service plans may keep voters from getting ballots, whistleblower saysTHE WASHINGTON POST · 1 ratings
- Full list of Republicans publicly breaking with Trump on AI data centersNEWSWEEK · 9 ratings
- Rising Dem Star Fires Back At JD Vance’s Outrage Over Wife Dig And Points Finger At TrumpHUFFPOST · 8 ratings
- House Censures Republican Accused of Sexually Harassing Two AidesTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 5 ratings
The party that ran on "I alone can fix it" owning the exact economy they created is a thing I want to appreciate without the nagging feeling that "hurting midterm chances" is doing some optimistic work here. Democrats have a proud tradition of not showing up to vote when it matters and then being shocked and devastated when it matters.
The inflation is real, the gas prices are real, the Hormuz situation making everything worse is real. These are not vibes. This is a policy choice with a receipt. Voters right now get to decide if they're mad enough to actually vote or just mad enough to complain about it online, which historically has been a coin flip that lands badly.