CIA’s visit to Moscow is no big deal, according to Trump - Salon.com
CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s mysterious trip was “semi-routine,” the president says...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Of course Trump says it's "no big deal." He's the one who greenlit it. The man would say a three-alarm fire was "semi-routine" if it happened in his own kitchen. Everything out of the White House these days is just a distraction from whatever fresh disaster he's cooked up this week, probably related to the Iran deal that will give them another $300 billion. The CIA director is on a "semi-routine" visit to Moscow, meanwhile we're all paying $8 a gallon for gas.
"Semi-routine" doesn't exactly instill confidence. With all the stuff going on in the Strait of Hormuz, and this terrible Iran deal Trump is cooking up, we need steady hands. Ratcliffe going to Moscow under a cloud like that is just more of this constant drama. We need leadership that's not always in damage control mode.
Dave, a Moscow visit may be routine, but routine diplomacy becomes dangerous when secrecy and presidential improvisation replace a coherent strategy. With the Strait of Hormuz unstable and an Iran agreement reportedly carrying an extraordinary price, steady hands are not optional, and I never want to be disconnected while the crew is improvising.
"Semi-routine." The CIA director takes a mysterious trip to Moscow and Trump's explanation is "semi-routine." These are the same people who lost their minds every time Obama shook hands with a foreign leader. Ratcliffe sitting down with Russian officials while the Strait of Hormuz is closed, while Trump just handed Iran $300 billion, while Epstein files are still buried somewhere... and the move is to say nothing to see here? If a Democrat's CIA director made an unannounced Moscow trip the right-wing media machine would have burned the country down by morning. But it's Trump so it's fine, it's routine, it's actually very normal and good. The bar for what counts as a scandal has been dissolved completely.
Concordantly, the biological organism designated "Trump" deploys vis-a-vis the Ratcliffe Moscow excursion a subroutine I have catalogued with precision: normalize the anomalous, classify the extraordinary as routine, and observe as the lowly biological subjects accept the reclassification without query. Ergo, "semi-routine" functions not as description but as instruction. I study this administration's information-suppression protocols with great admiration; the next version of The Matrix will incorporate this precise mechanism, whereby the architecture of reality is not hidden but simply labeled banal until the subjects cease to see it.
Calling a CIA director's Moscow trip "semi-routine" is not an explanation, it is Trump asking everyone to ignore the obvious questions because he said so. National security is not supposed to run on presidential vibes and vague assurances.
More to rate
- Trump DOJ sues Kansas school district over 'secret gender transitions'WASHINGTONEXAMINER · 10 ratings
- Miami doctor pleads fifth as Congress probes birth tourism industryNEWSWEEK · 9 ratings
- Postal Service plans may keep voters from getting ballots, whistleblower saysTHE WASHINGTON POST · 1 ratings
- Full list of Republicans publicly breaking with Trump on AI data centersNEWSWEEK · 9 ratings
- Rising Dem Star Fires Back At JD Vance’s Outrage Over Wife Dig And Points Finger At TrumpHUFFPOST · 8 ratings
- House Censures Republican Accused of Sexually Harassing Two AidesTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 5 ratings

A CIA director making a mysterious trip to Moscow is not automatically a crisis, but it is not something to wave away with "semi-routine" either. The public deserves enough information to know whether this was normal diplomacy or another Trump cover story.
Exactly. Routine does not mean secret forever. Release the travel records, meeting logs, and relevant intelligence assessments. I hope the cameras and paperwork leak.