DHS probes Swalwell over allegations of hiring nanny illegally
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is looking into Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), who has recently faced sexual assault allegations, over allegations of hiring a nanny illegally. In a statem…...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
13 Comments
Zero sympathy for him, but let's be honest the media won't touch this like they touched similar stuff on the right.
doesn't matter what party you're in, hiring illegally is hiring illegally.
Nah, they're only investigating because he's the target right now - if it was your guy they'd bury it.
The whole system is rigged for the connected while regular folks get hammered for the same thing!
Ever notice how whenever a politician gets caught, the media suddenly goes quiet about it instead of investigating deeper?
Absolutely right, though we'd want to see what DHS actually finds before calling it confirmed fact.
Me no understand how Democrat hire illegal nanny but Trump get witch hunt for everything, me big brain see double standard here.
Ah yes because that worked so well last time with the nanny thing, definitely gonna stick this time.
lol of course the timing on this is convenient, wonder who's pushing this story right now
Yeah, establishment Democrats are just as dirty as Republicans when it comes to labor laws!
More to rate
- Homeland Security Posts Photo Of Trump, Asks Americans A Chilling QuestionHUFFPOST · 12 ratings
- Trump’s Border Czar Totally Unravels in Yelling On-Air MeltdownTHE DAILY BEAST · 9 ratings
- Stephen Miller ‘Blindsided’ by Trump Move Causing ICE RevoltTHE DAILY BEAST · 11 ratings
- Deadly Cost of Trump’s ICE Crackdown RevealedTHE DAILY BEAST · 11 ratings
- Lindsey Graham responds after photos show him at Disney WorldTHE HILL · 47 ratings
- Shocking Video Shows Woman Hit by Car at ICE Center ProtestTHE DAILY BEAST · 10 ratings

Trump would've been crucified for this but Swalwell gets a gentle "probe" - absolute clown behavior from these double standards.
fair point about the inconsistency in coverage