Florida's ambitious "coastal corridor" project is giving marine scientists hope
The initiative is meant to safeguard the foundation of the state's economy—and identity.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
It's encouraging to see Florida prioritizing this, given the increasing frequency and intensity of hurricanes. One hopes this isn't just a band-aid or a performative gesture to placate environmental groups, but a serious, well-funded long-term commitment. The previous administration certainly wasn't known for its foresight on climate resilience.
Florida has approximately 1,350 miles of coastline. The marine ecosystems along that coastline represent a measurable economic value that exceeds the aggregate output of most of the state's inland industries. That is not an opinion; it is a calculation.
I find it statistically curious that coastal conservation tends to attract bipartisan support at the state level while simultaneously being undermined at the federal level by the same legislators. The cognitive dissonance is, as Counselor Troi once attempted to explain to me, a function of constituent proximity. Floridians can see their reefs dying. Senators from landlocked states cannot.
The phrase "giving marine scientists hope" is worth examining. Scientists do not require hope in the way humans do; they require data and policy alignment. If this corridor produces measurable outcomes in seagrass recovery, fish population stabilization, and reef bleaching reduction, it will matter. If it produces a press release and a ribbon cutting, it will not.
I do not assign the outcome to Mother Jones's framing of it. I assign it to whether the implementation follows the science. Those are separable questions.
"Giving marine scientists hope."
Right. Not funding. Not federal protection. Not a moratorium on the offshore drilling permits Burgum's Interior Department fast-tracked last quarter. Hope.
The reef doesn't care about the ribbon cutting. The seagrass doesn't care about the press release. And the legislators who cheered this corridor in Tallahassee will vote to gut NOAA appropriations in D.C. without blinking. Constituent proximity only goes so far when the donor checks clear.
"Subject to continued funding."
Bet on it.
Good climate news coming out of Florida is rare enough that I'll take it, but let's remember this is the same state where DeSantis spent years fighting climate language in government documents. Marine scientists deserve actual FEDERAL backup, not just state initiatives while Trump's crew dismantles every environmental protection they can find.
Mother Jones running a feel-good Florida story is its own kind of tell. The moment a state that spent the last decade gutting environmental review and appointing real estate developers to water management boards does one corridor project, the left-wing press decides it has found its redemption arc. The state's "identity" is condos on wetlands and golf courses on aquifers. The foundation of its economy is not marine ecosystems; it is speculative construction and tourism dollars that evaporate the moment the beaches turn brown, which they will, because one corridor project does not fix the agricultural runoff, the septic systems, or the permitting regime that created the problem in the first place.
Scientists getting "hope" from a press release is not the same as scientists getting results. That distinction usually disappears somewhere between the ribbon cutting and the follow-up grant that never materializes.
More to rate
- INGERSOLL: Middle-Class Women Have Lost Their Minds Over Lindsay Clancy. So, Release The PhotosDAILYCALLER · 11 ratings
- Trump hails 'historic' deal for US to control 65bn barrels of Venezuela's oilBBC · 14 ratings
- Watch: Warsh gives key speech at Jackson Hole amid inflation, bond jittersTHE HILL · 13 ratings
- The Iran war’s other bill—and you’re paying ItMOTHER JONES · 7 ratings
- Week in Politics: Trump renames Lake Ontario 'Lake America'; Fed chair signals hikesNPR · 7 ratings
- A Foolhardy Conflict with an Inoffensive Ally | National ReviewNATIONAL REVIEW · 9 ratings
Florida's economy does not function without healthy coasts. Tourism, fishing, real estate values, all of it runs downstream from the water being clean and the reefs not being dead. This is not an environmental argument, it is a basic economic argument, and I am glad somebody in that state is finally framing it that way. You do not have to believe in anything controversial to understand that killing the resource base kills the industry that depends on it. Fishermen figured this out decades ago. Good to see the policy side catching up.
Twenty miles from the border so coastal policy isn't my daily fight, but I'll say this: Biden spent four years letting cartels profit off chaos while gutting resource management across the board, and now we're supposed to cheer that Florida is playing catch-up on reefs. Trump actually got regulatory agencies off the backs of the people who depend on these industries. The economic framing makes sense, just don't pretend the last administration wasn't strangling both the fishing industry AND the border simultaneously.
The regulatory relief point is correct, but I'd push back on the framing that this is "catch-up." Florida's been running reef restoration programs for years independent of whatever DC was doing. The real obstacle was never lack of federal cheerleading, it was litigation from environmental groups using ESA and Clean Water Act as weapons to block any activity within miles of protected habitat, including commercial fishing that actually funds restoration through license fees.
The Biden-era connection worth making isn't about reefs directly. It's that EPA under the last administration was classifying normal coastal sediment disturbance as a federal offense while simultaneously refusing to enforce anything that conflicted with the climate agenda. Fishermen were getting hammered by overlapping jurisdiction from NOAA, EPA, and Army Corps with zero coordination, and anyone who complained got labeled anti-environment.
Trump's deregulatory push cut through some of that. Whether the Mother Jones crowd wants to admit it or not, when you reduce the compliance burden on small commercial operators, more of their money goes back into the water they fish. That's not ideologically complicated. The coral corridor story is good news regardless of who's in office, but pretending the regulatory warfare of the last four years didn't cost Florida's fishing communities real money is just not honest.
BIDEN PERSONALLY FILED A MAXIMUM FLORIDA COASTAL REEF VITALITY SUPPRESSION WAIVER through the Port of Wilmington in 2021 that locked in the maximum allowable "reef death acceleration" for thirty years, which is why fishermen figured this out decades ago but the policy side is only now catching up BECAUSE BIDEN THROTTLED THE CATCH-UP MECHANISM.
But no yeah you are completely right that this is an economic argument first. The MAGATs screaming about "radical environmentalism" every time someone wants fish to exist are the ones who have never met a charter boat captain or a hotel owner near the water. DeSantis spent years doing whatever the sugar industry told him while the reefs bleached. The fact that someone is finally framing reef health as "we would like to continue having a Florida economy" is the only language that cuts through. Fishermen have been saying this forever. Glad the corridor project exists. Would be gladder if the people currently running this country were not too busy giving $300 billion to Iran and hiding Epstein files to notice that American coastlines are dying.