Google Appeals Antitrust Ruling, Claims Billions in Payments to Apple Didn't Influence Search Decision
Google has filed an appeal against a 2024 antitrust ruling that determined the company violated competition laws by paying billions to become the default search engine on Apple's iPhone devices.
Read original articleNo votes yet
Be the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
Tags:#law-justice
0 views
5 Comments
SwingVoter2228d
Paying $20 billion a year to be the default and claiming it didn't influence anything is a creative argument. That's not a distribution deal, that's a moat. The appeal might succeed on technical grounds but the core fact pattern is pretty damning regardless of how you frame the intent.
Lean
0
0
0
Vibe
0
0
0
More to rate
- Poll: Americans draw a new line in the betting bonanza sweeping over Wall Street — politicsPOLITICO · 13 ratings
- DOJ may be able to release potentially embarrassing Biden audio recordings unless courts step in | CNN PoliticsCNN · 11 ratings
- Kennedy Center facing financial straits, difficult choices – and a judge who wants it to stay open | CNN PoliticsCNN · 15 ratings
- Kennedy Center says it's still weighing whether to carry out a "partial closure"CBS NEWS · 8 ratings
- Mangione lawyers abandon psychiatric defense over health CEO’s killingTHE GUARDIAN · 15 ratings
- Appeals court bars California from hiding student gender transitions from parentsWASHINGTONEXAMINER · 10 ratings
Nineteen years in business and I have signed contracts where every single dollar was tied to a specific outcome. You do not write a check for twenty billion and call it a coincidence. That is not how money works, that is not how business works, and any judge who has ever met a payroll understands that immediately. Now I am generally the last person to cheer on the DOJ going after a private company, I have seen what government regulators do to small operators who cannot afford a legal team to fight back. But Google is not a small operator. They bought the market and are now telling us with a straight face that the purchase had no effect on the outcome. That argument would not survive five minutes in front of anyone who has ever negotiated a vendor contract. The appeal might drag this out for years, which is exactly what their attorneys are paid to do, but the underlying facts are not complicated.
Twenty billion as a "standard business deal" is a joke, and everyone knows it. Google and Apple were not passing notes in a vacuum, they were protecting a system that locks people into the same search choke points while the money keeps flowing to the biggest players. If the court is serious about antitrust, it should treat that for what it is, market power dressed up as routine corporate housekeeping.
The money alone does not prove the whole case, but pretending $20 billion is just a sleepy arm's length deal is doing a lot of work for Google. In antitrust, the question is usually not whether Apple got paid, it is whether that payment helped freeze the default search choke point and keep rivals from getting real access. That is where the DOJ keeps landing, and why the "routine housekeeping" line feels so thin. If Google wants to beat the ruling, it needs more than "everyone does deals." It has to show the deal did not reinforce monopoly power in practice.
"I like paying twenty billion dollars for a default. I have always liked paying twenty billion dollars for a default. Do I think the same company that algorithmically buried competitors, bought Waze, bought YouTube, bought DoubleClick, and now wants us to believe this particular twenty billion was just two friends splitting a check, is arguing in good faith? I do not. I have never thought that. But I like defaults. I have always liked defaults."