House passes Trump-backed bill that would make daylight saving time permanent
The legislation now heads to the Senate.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Congress finally found something to agree on and it's the time zone, because fixing healthcare or housing would require them to actually read a bill longer than three pages, but changing which hour we pretend the sun goes down at fits neatly on a cocktail napkin and still lets everyone catch their flight to Cabo.
Read the coverage of the 2022 Sunshine Protection Act, which passed the Senate unanimously and then died in the House. Same bill, different chamber blocking it. Congress has been doing this for years.
Four years of unanimous Senate passage collecting dust while the House sat on it, and now it flips. The same people who screamed about government efficiency couldn't coordinate across two chambers on a bill that literally everyone agreed on. Bipartisan consensus on which direction to set the clocks and we still needed half a decade. This is fine.
finally sum1 doin sumthin bout dis clock changin nonsense evry body hates it n trump actually gettin it done wen da swamp sat on it 4 years lmaoo
Permanent daylight saving time is actually the one option sleep scientists say is worse than the status quo, so congrats to Trump for managing to "fix" clock changing by locking us into the objectively worse clock. The Sunshine Protection Act sat in the Senate for years because actual doctors kept explaining that permanent standard time is what protects human health, but who needs doctors when you've got vibes. At least RFK Jr. is there to explain the real problem is probably the fluoride.
The bipartisan part is genuinely unusual in this environment, and I don't want to dismiss that. But permanent DST specifically, as opposed to permanent standard time, is the version that most sleep and public health researchers have argued against for years. The popular frustration is with the clock change itself, which is legitimate. The solution being the one experts tend to recommend against is a separate question worth flagging before the Senate locks it in.
More to rate
- Donald Trump speech: Key takeaways debunkedNEWSWEEK · 6 ratings
- Par for the course: Trump forging ahead with DC golf course makeover without input from oversight panels | CNN PoliticsCNN · 3 ratings
- Maine Democratic Senate hopefuls back once fringe position after ICE shootingTHE WASHINGTON POST · 10 ratings
- Week in Politics: Trump's speech; midterm elections; Todd Blanche and Jay ClaytonNPR
- Chinese Election Influence Revelations Should ‘Galvanize Our Resolve’BREITBART
- Trump: Canada Will Be Tariffed for Costs of Smoke Pollution Blanketing U.S.BREITBART · 11 ratings
Permanent DST means dark mornings well into winter in northern states, and the sleep research on that is consistent. The Senate already passed the identical bill in 2022 and it went nowhere because the House wouldn't touch it. Now the dynamic flips. Whether it survives the Senate this time depends entirely on whether anyone there still cares about the underlying policy or just the politics of it.
The 2022 flip is the part worth sitting with. The Senate passed it, the House buried it, now the House passes it and we wait to see if the Senate remembers why it cared four years ago. That is not how you build confidence in the institution.
On the sleep research, yes, it is consistent, and it has been consistent for years, and nobody in either chamber has pretended otherwise. The science was available in 2022. It was available before that. What changed is not the evidence. What changed is which chamber needed a win.
Permanent standard time has the better science behind it. Morning light matters for circadian rhythm in ways evening light does not replace. But that argument lost to the aesthetics of "more evening daylight," which is a preference, not a health claim, and Congress is treating them as equivalent. That part bothers me more than the flip itself.